Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: I lol @ the debates
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:46 am 
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9967
Location: västkustskt
discuss

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:48 am 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3473
Location: Stuntin'.
Can I ask why?

_________________
Image



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:49 am 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2342
Location:
Off Topic
seriously I can't believe Britney lost custody of her children...

She's just going through hard times now. WHY CANT YOU JUST LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!!

_________________
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:50 am 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3303
Location: パズドラ
<<:roll:>>- edit..
Lets discuss~ the order of the food chain instead =)
The people have h4xd every pop stars life... and you can see an example through Britney. Why do people like 2 pick on them like that... dam life hax0rz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:57 am 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2148
Location: 5 Mins Ahead
There all scum Politicians are all scums in america
The ones that are not, get murdered

_________________
If the concept of us being all one consciousness's and us being one thing that lives endless through the cycle of nature the only clear emotion would be understanding .
we be in a utopia
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:21 am 
Dom's Slut
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13791
Location:
Guildwars2
magisuns wrote:
<<:roll:>>- edit..
Lets discuss~ the order of the food chain instead =)
The people have h4xd every pop stars life... and you can see an example through Britney. Why do people like 2 pick on them like that... dam life hax0rz



LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!!!1!1!!1111!1

:x

_________________
ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:26 am 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 723
Location:
Redsea
I never used to know anything about celebrities. However, I work as a cashier now. I get bored and read the magazines. It's all crazy man.

Brittany is becoming the tabloids favorite target. Now they are trying to move to Jamie.

At least some good stories are going on in the magazines now days. Like how Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are hanging out with their kids. Dang, they wanted 12 kids!!! Now they are shooting for 9, or have 9 I think.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:56 am 
Loyal Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1923
Location:
Off Topic
may I ask...who cares :?

_________________
Quote:
- j a c k y - says (4:48 PM):
i can do sexual puns all day my friend
RuYi wrote:
You just got yourself +70 Ru Yi points!
xDDD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:01 am 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5887
Location: www.youporn.com
taintofsleep wrote:
I never used to know anything about celebrities. However, I work as a cashier now. I get bored and read the magazines. It's all crazy man.

Brittany is becoming the tabloids favorite target. Now they are trying to move to Jamie.

At least some good stories are going on in the magazines now days. Like how Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are hanging out with their kids. Dang, they wanted 12 kids!!! Now they are shooting for 9, or have 9 I think.


poor angy :(

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:26 am 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 723
Location:
Redsea
Fat_Smurf wrote:
taintofsleep wrote:
I never used to know anything about celebrities. However, I work as a cashier now. I get bored and read the magazines. It's all crazy man.

Brittany is becoming the tabloids favorite target. Now they are trying to move to Jamie.

At least some good stories are going on in the magazines now days. Like how Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are hanging out with their kids. Dang, they wanted 12 kids!!! Now they are shooting for 9, or have 9 I think.


poor angy :(


She doesn't have to worry about it. They adopt from 3rd world countries for some reason. (think it has to do that they aren't good enough parents to pass for adoption in the US)

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Last edited by taintofsleep on Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:26 am 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3303
Location: パズドラ
CrimsonNuker wrote:
magisuns wrote:
<<:roll:>>- edit..
Lets discuss~ the order of the food chain instead =)
The people have h4xd every pop stars life... and you can see an example through Britney. Why do people like 2 pick on them like that... dam life hax0rz



LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!!!1!1!!1111!1

:x

I is in favour of Britney :x :x :x
Can I haz my Samwedge now?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:55 pm 
Forum Legend
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7885
Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.
Let's discuss Dom, opinions: Is he hot?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:56 pm 
Forum God
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11256
Location: Pimpas Paradise.
What do you people think of the crowding taxes?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:21 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3216
Location: wat
dom 'aint nothin' without his breast implants.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:35 pm 
Elite Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6423
Location: ____
IMO Obama won it. Even though he was stuttering like a b1tch. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 8:02 pm 
Chronicle Writer
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9841
Location: US - Illidan
wow i love how the OTL decided to act retarded and go completely off topic....way to go!

OT: i agree with draquish anyway.....Obama won that

_________________
Image Image
signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:34 pm 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3272
Location:
Off Topic
I think this is the direction future debates should be based upon. Even though it was more of the same I just fell in love with with the round table atmosphere. Good to see what the evolution of 'debates' might be.
After seeing the nth debate I feel that people will vote more on feeling than issues/experience. To me, all the candidates in their respective parties are the same except for the way they act. I see very little disagreement on issues and if there is any it's very minuet. It also seems that people, this is only two states though, are latching onto the 'change' propaganda which all the Dems and Ron Paul are using. If the trend of the states voting more for the Dems keeps up I'll bet we'll have a Dem president. None of the Rep, besides Paul who's still polling low, really has any change a part of their platform. Change as in the White House politics anyway.
Assuming the trend does keep up I predict a McCain (or Paul if Rep don't wake up) v. the Dems (which are still too close to call imo) with the Dem winning against McCain or most likely winning against, hopeful, Paul.

As to the debate 'winners'
[SD]draquish wrote:
IMO Obama won it. Even though he was stuttering like a b1tch. :roll:

I completely disagree. Obama was tired over the work he's been doing and it showed. After hearing good things about his victory speech I was very underwhelmed by his performance. Like I said above, there aren't many things differentiating candidates and Obama's strong point, charisma, didn't get to me.
I felt Edwards took the floor for the Dems. He had a lot of passion, talked about change, and a couple of strats. I also thought Richardson did fairly well considering I knew nothing about his positions. He did reiterate his record too much though.
For the Rep I have to go for the lite of the night. All the candidates seemed to argue and were very serious except Thompson. He's usually an uptight dick but last night was very lively and humorous. I don't like him because he's another warmonger like Rudy but he had an "I don't care" tude. Humor ftw. Lastly, it's always nice when Paul gets his crazy liberty ideas out even though he did ramble on like he does sometimes.


XemnasXD wrote:
wow i love how the OTL decided to act retarded and go completely off topic....way to go!

I try not to comment on it anymore since the mods have a laissez faire policy.

_________________
Image
No government?!?! Oh, noes! Total chaos! Or would it be? http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:39 pm 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1337
Location: Place to place.
Nuklear wrote:
I think this is the direction future debates should be based upon. Even though it was more of the same I just fell in love with with the round table atmosphere. Good to see what the evolution of 'debates' might be.
After seeing the nth debate I feel that people will vote more on feeling than issues/experience. To me, all the candidates in their respective parties are the same except for the way they act. I see very little disagreement on issues and if there is any it's very minuet. It also seems that people, this is only two states though, are latching onto the 'change' propaganda which all the Dems and Ron Paul are using. If the trend of the states voting more for the Dems keeps up I'll bet we'll have a Dem president. None of the Rep, besides Paul who's still polling low, really has any change a part of their platform. Change as in the White House politics anyway.
Assuming the trend does keep up I predict a McCain (or Paul if Rep don't wake up) v. the Dems (which are still too close to call imo) with the Dem winning against McCain or most likely winning against, hopeful, Paul.

As to the debate 'winners'
[SD]draquish wrote:
IMO Obama won it. Even though he was stuttering like a b1tch. :roll:

I completely disagree. Obama was tired over the work he's been doing and it showed. After hearing good things about his victory speech I was very underwhelmed by his performance. Like I said above, there aren't many things differentiating candidates and Obama's strong point, charisma, didn't get to me.
I felt Edwards took the floor for the Dems. He had a lot of passion, talked about change, and a couple of strats. I also thought Richardson did fairly well considering I knew nothing about his positions. He did reiterate his record too much though.
For the Rep I have to go for the lite of the night. All the candidates seemed to argue and were very serious except Thompson. He's usually an uptight dick but last night was very lively and humorous. I don't like him because he's another warmonger like Rudy but he had an "I don't care" tude. Humor ftw. Lastly, it's always nice when Paul gets his crazy liberty ideas out even though he did ramble on like he does sometimes.


XemnasXD wrote:
wow i love how the OTL decided to act retarded and go completely off topic....way to go!

I try not to comment on it anymore since the mods have a laissez faire policy.


Ummmmm...
I agree.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:05 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Location:
Xian
to lazy to read long posts atm. Im sure i'd agree 2. 8)

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:49 pm 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3303
Location: パズドラ
Leipo wrote:
to lazy to read long posts atm. Im sure i'd agree 2. 8)

lolx I swear there are like 5 different topics in here so far :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:06 pm 
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9967
Location: västkustskt
Democrats don't have any viable candidates - it's a joke; the only possible one is Richardson but like the american people are going to elect a mexican.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:18 pm 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3272
Location:
Off Topic
I agree, but we're still talking about the stupid average american who takes things for granted and will vote on feelings and what people tell them. On election day I'm not voting for a socialist or a fascist. If Ron Paul or a better candidate isn't on the ballet I'm going to write-in or skip that question.

_________________
Image
No government?!?! Oh, noes! Total chaos! Or would it be? http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group