Chief wrote:
Thanks guys, he finally believed me...
I didn't believe you as much as I found out what you were talking about.
The entire conversation was about how a thief killed me without me seeing any horses at all, and how the thief followed me half way across the desert while still summoning thieves. The only fact I knew was that the thief was not on any horse/camel and thieves were attacking therefor he had to either have a horse farther behind, or you didn't need a horse to summon thieves (I'm pretty new to the game so I don't know for sure for myself.)
Early in the conversation I was mistaken, as he was sounding as if you had to be 'on' the horse/camel to summon a thief.
As a matter of fact, an exact quote from our argument on MSN:
Me:
they don't have to be on their camel
Him:
BS
I explained the situation, which I said a thief was following me summoning NPC thieves, but I didn't know if the thief had a horse/camel, as there was no horse in sight. So apparently the horse was just farther behind summoning NPC thieves which caught up to me.
As a matter of fact further into the conversation I pressed wether or not he was trying to say the thief had to be ON the horse/camel to summon it or not. In which I found out that they had to after asking my guild, end of discussion.
Quote:
Call him a n00b and tell him to stfu. Works for me!
I don't deny the fact that I'm new to this game, but telling someone to "stfu" when you're (Chief not you) making contradictions yourself is quite ignorant if you ask me.