|
Silkroad Online
|
Silkroad Forums
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
nightbloom
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:10 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 5492 Location:
|
Da_Realest wrote: nightbloom wrote: Da_Realest wrote: My point still stands though. If the GM's wanted everyone to start with level 70 accounts then they would have made that so. I suppose emotionally, your point does still stand.. But logically, it has more holes than a coke can in a Tennessee gravel pit. Its not emotionally its a given. Just starting at level 70 would not give reason to most of the game. There would be no reason to have mobs or equip levels 1-63.
Still don't understand why you keep insulting me.
It IS emotional. You feel that it is not fair. Some ppl are born with money. THey didnt work for it, their ancestor did. Did God intend for some ppl to start out ahead in life or for everyone to start at the same place? You had to work for your char's level, he didnt. He didnt break a rule or in any way violate the TOS. He "deserves" that char as much as anyone. That leaves your point as an emotional and not legal one.
Do you feel like my pointing out the holes in your argument to be insulting? Should I just agree with you and follow the herd? I really am not very good at that kinda thing.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations: being a constant problem. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
GaiaX
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:10 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 150 Location:
|
MrJoey wrote: Da_Realest, Gaia has said 2-3 or more times, that he/she's gotten 3 char's to level 70. That kinda makes your whole logic.... dumb.
Agreed, and that is what I said. YAY smeone acually paid attention and read what I wrote! THANKS! And no I'm not be sacrastic.
Note: here's a video worth watching if you haven't.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvYxlIAq364
_________________
Last edited by GaiaX on Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hi_babe_
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:13 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 333 Location: o.O Is It BlackFox in mY aVa LOL !!!
|
technically when 2 persons have id&pw the account is "illegal joint account sharing" because account's info have been shared between 2 guys
also accounts are joymax's property, joymax give the use of an account to the person who accepted the TOA ONLY.
You can give something to someone only if the thing is your property.
An account can be given by Joymax only because every account is joymax's property.
i won't flame Billion's friend tho because i understand that a good PW/ID of a pretty good account can be interessant and because non-legit shits are joymax's jobs not user's.
Nevertheless, it s not legit.
_________________ Black_babe_ 100% legit glavier lvl 80. Isis
o.O SeCreT wrote: "SP go back to your thread"
BlackFox wrote: @hi_babe_ ..You are smart now i see
|
|
Top |
|
 |
GaiaX
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:19 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 150 Location:
|
hi_babe_ wrote: technically when 2 persons have id&pw the account is "illegal joint account sharing" because account's info have been shared between 2 guys also accounts are joymax's property, joymax give the use of an account to the person who accepted the TOA ONLY. You can give something to someone only if the thing is your property. An account can be given by Joymax only because every account is joymax's property. i won't flame Billion's friend tho because i understand that a good PW/ID of a pretty good account can be interessant and because non-legit shits are joymax's jobs not user's.  Nevertheless, it s not legit.
He doesn't have any access of it anymore. Also since I am on this character and I own it now, IT IS LEGIT
End of story.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Da_Realest
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:20 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 2435 Location:
|
nightbloom wrote: Da_Realest wrote: nightbloom wrote: Da_Realest wrote: My point still stands though. If the GM's wanted everyone to start with level 70 accounts then they would have made that so. I suppose emotionally, your point does still stand.. But logically, it has more holes than a coke can in a Tennessee gravel pit. Its not emotionally its a given. Just starting at level 70 would not give reason to most of the game. There would be no reason to have mobs or equip levels 1-63.
Still don't understand why you keep insulting me.It IS emotional. You feel that it is not fair. Some ppl are born with money. THey didnt work for it, their ancestor did. Did God intend for some ppl to start out ahead in life or for everyone to start at the same place? You had to work for your char's level, he didnt. He didnt break a rule or in any way violate the TOS. He "deserves" that char as much as anyone. That leaves your point as an emotional and not legal one. Do you feel like my pointing out the holes in your argument to be insulting? Should I just agree with you and follow the herd? I really am not very good at that kinda thing. I see what you're saying. But, if the GM's wanted everyone to start at level 70 then why didn't they do that way?
And no, you don't have to agree with me. Just your choice of diction. Its just an attempt at keeping this as a simple discussion instead of turning this into flaming.MrJoey wrote: Da_Realest, Gaia has said 2-3 or more times, that he/she's gotten 3 char's to level 70. That kinda makes your whole logic.... dumb. Thanks for your time.
_________________
Ziegfried wrote: What you do or say in any game is a small extension of who you really are. It's the anonymity that can allow them to show their true self, or who they would be if there was no "penalty" for their actions.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hi_babe_
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:24 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 333 Location: o.O Is It BlackFox in mY aVa LOL !!!
|
GaiaX wrote: hi_babe_ wrote: technically when 2 persons have id&pw the account is "illegal joint account sharing" because account's info have been shared between 2 guys also accounts are joymax's property, joymax give the use of an account to the person who accepted the TOA ONLY. You can give something to someone only if the thing is your property. An account can be given by Joymax only because every account is joymax's property. i won't flame Billion's friend tho because i understand that a good PW/ID of a pretty good account can be interessant and because non-legit shits are joymax's jobs not user's.  Nevertheless, it s not legit. He doesn't have any access of it anymore. Also since I am on this character and I own it now, IT IS LEGIT
End of story.
No it's not. Fact that he plays it or not won't do shit. Joymax gave the right of using the acc to Billion, not to you. you can't use joymax's property without joymax's agreement legally.
_________________ Black_babe_ 100% legit glavier lvl 80. Isis
o.O SeCreT wrote: "SP go back to your thread"
BlackFox wrote: @hi_babe_ ..You are smart now i see
|
|
Top |
|
 |
nightbloom
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:25 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 5492 Location:
|
hi_babe_ wrote: technically when 2 persons have id&pw the account is "illegal joint account sharing" because account's info have been shared between 2 guys also accounts are joymax's property, joymax give the use of an account to the person who accepted the TOA ONLY. You can give something to someone only if the thing is your property. An account can be given by Joymax only because every account is joymax's property. i won't flame Billion's friend tho because i understand that a good PW/ID of a pretty good account can be interessant and because non-legit shits are joymax's jobs not user's.  Nevertheless, it s not legit. You are using the word "share" as common usage... Mirriam-Webster's Dictionary wrote: share 2 a : to partake of, use, experience, occupy, or enjoy with others b : to have in common <they share a passion for opera> 3 : to grant or give a share in -- often used with with <shared the last of her water with us> 4 : to tell (as thoughts, feelings, or experiences) to others -- often used with with But that is not a legal term as applied to a legal document ie: the TOS. Legally, shared is law.com Dictionary wrote: share the part allotted or belonging to one of a number owning together property or interest Nowhere does JoyMax prohibit an account being given without recompence. You are reading far more into the TOS than exists. hi_babe_ wrote: No it's not. Fact that he plays it or not won't do shit. Joymax gave the right of using the acc to Billion, not to you. you can't use joymax's property without joymax's agreement legally. He has several chars already. JoyMax TOS wrote: 1.2 User agreement that user agreed when user request register is basic of this operation policy therefore all users are deemed agree with this operation policy automatically.
He HAS made an aggreement with JoyMax, he did so automatically. It does not say that agreement only applies to one char.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations: being a constant problem. -SG>>
Last edited by nightbloom on Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
MrJoey
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:26 pm |
|
Elite Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 5570 Location: Being the forum ritalin
|
Guess what... JOYMAX DOESN'T CARE. Seriously, who gives a **** about account sharing. Never has joymax done anything about it, never will they. Same for account selling. It doesn't matter what the tos says, because joymax still isn't going to do anything about it.
_________________ Quoted from BuDo (Except I Am Vegeta cuz we all know he is a used tampon when it comes to his personality)
|
|
Top |
|
 |
GaiaX
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:27 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 150 Location:
|
Da_Realest wrote: Its just an attempt at keeping this as a simple discussion instead of turning this into flaming. Well your attempt is well not effective, because how I see it you're one of the people flaming not helping. Don't say it's not flaming because what you're saying towards me make me decide if it is flaming or not, and it is.hi_babe_ wrote: GaiaX wrote: hi_babe_ wrote: technically when 2 persons have id&pw the account is "illegal joint account sharing" because account's info have been shared between 2 guys also accounts are joymax's property, joymax give the use of an account to the person who accepted the TOA ONLY. You can give something to someone only if the thing is your property. An account can be given by Joymax only because every account is joymax's property. i won't flame Billion's friend tho because i understand that a good PW/ID of a pretty good account can be interessant and because non-legit shits are joymax's jobs not user's.  Nevertheless, it s not legit. He doesn't have any access of it anymore. Also since I am on this character and I own it now, IT IS LEGIT
End of story. No it's not. Fact that he plays it or not won't do shit. Joymax gave the right of using the acc to Billion, not to you. you can't use joymax's property without joymax's agreement legally.
It's nice to see you're following the rules. But as MrJoey said, would JM ever care?
Even if they did, this is legal. You are looking at it as if we are sharing but you're using it out of contents and out of this situation, so you're point is useless here.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Da_Realest
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:33 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 2435 Location:
|
GaiaX wrote: Da_Realest wrote: Its just an attempt at keeping this as a simple discussion instead of turning this into flaming. Well your attempt is well not effective, because how I see it you're one of the people flaming not helping. Don't say it's not flaming because what you're saying towards me make me decide if it is flaming or not, and it is. Yea, I guess I'm flaming cause I don't agree with what you did. Never said anything disrespectful, I just don't agree and I'm providing reasons that wouldn't change if I was talking to JoeAverage about the same thing. I guess you can't debate anything on a forum.
_________________
Ziegfried wrote: What you do or say in any game is a small extension of who you really are. It's the anonymity that can allow them to show their true self, or who they would be if there was no "penalty" for their actions.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
GaiaX
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:38 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 150 Location:
|
Da_Realest wrote: GaiaX wrote: Da_Realest wrote: Its just an attempt at keeping this as a simple discussion instead of turning this into flaming. Well your attempt is well not effective, because how I see it you're one of the people flaming not helping. Don't say it's not flaming because what you're saying towards me make me decide if it is flaming or not, and it is. Yea, I guess I'm flaming cause I don't agree with what you did. Never said anything disrespectful, I just don't agree and I'm providing reasons that wouldn't change if I was talking to JoeAverage about the same thing. I guess you can't debate anything on a forum.
But can't you put aside the facts and give me a chance to prove myself as a new owner. EVEN THOUGH I didn't work on this character, I will be in the future. And the Legit-Fairy can tell you, promising I will play legitly. I don't want anymore flaming going on here. Still I know I will have enemies, but this is how it is, I guess it's to be accepted or not.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hi_babe_
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:48 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 333 Location: o.O Is It BlackFox in mY aVa LOL !!!
|
Quote: 4. User is solely responsible for managing user ID, password and character ID, and the Company shall not be responsible for any losses caused by the User's carelessness in user account management or illegal use by a third party.
*reading the TOS lalala...* 
_________________ Black_babe_ 100% legit glavier lvl 80. Isis
o.O SeCreT wrote: "SP go back to your thread"
BlackFox wrote: @hi_babe_ ..You are smart now i see
|
|
Top |
|
 |
GaiaX
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:51 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 150 Location:
|
hi_babe_ wrote: Quote: 4. User is solely responsible for managing user ID, password and character ID, and the Company shall not be responsible for any losses caused by the User's carelessness in user account management or illegal use by a third party. *reading the TOS lalala...* 
Is it really illegal use of third party...? I don't really think so. Also they say they are not responsible, soo... what next?
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hi_babe_
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:54 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 333 Location: o.O Is It BlackFox in mY aVa LOL !!!
|
GaiaX wrote: hi_babe_ wrote: Quote: 4. User is solely responsible for managing user ID, password and character ID, and the Company shall not be responsible for any losses caused by the User's carelessness in user account management or illegal use by a third party. *reading the TOS lalala...*  Is it really illegal use of third party...? I don't really think so. Also they say they are not responsible ?
part 1 = Joymax
part 2 = Billion
illegal part 3 = YOU LOL
the TOS is an agreement between 2 part : joymax and billion.
only those 2 part signed with the TOS for this account.
you are the thierd part, illegal using ;_;
man 
_________________ Black_babe_ 100% legit glavier lvl 80. Isis
o.O SeCreT wrote: "SP go back to your thread"
BlackFox wrote: @hi_babe_ ..You are smart now i see
|
|
Top |
|
 |
nightbloom
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:58 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 5492 Location:
|
hi_babe_ wrote: Quote: 4. User is solely responsible for managing user ID, password and character ID, and the Company shall not be responsible for any losses caused by the User's carelessness in user account management or illegal use by a third party. *reading the TOS lalala...*  That portion is adressing JoyMax's responsibilities in regards to account loss due to user negligence. lol They say that the User is solely responsible. The original user was Cyrusis, he had the responsibilty of managing that account ID and password. He has given that responsibility to Gaia and therefore relinquished his own. Gaia has now become the 2nd party and no third party exists. hi_babe_ wrote: part 1 = Joymax part 2 = Billion illegal part 3 = YOU LOL the TOS is an agreement between 2 part : joymax and billion. only those 2 part signed with the TOS for this account. you are the thierd part, illegal using ;_; man  Again... JoyMax TOS wrote: 1.2 User agreement that user agreed when user request register is basic of this operation policy therefore all users are deemed agree with this operation policy automatically.
WHen Gaia made an account, he agreed to the TOS. It applies automatically.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations: being a constant problem. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
nycxfool
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:02 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 565 Location:
|
well i read about 50% of this post, and i can tell ppl are flaming you cuz u got a lvl70 account. how you got it is ur business, and i dont realyl care.
ppl flame u cuz most of the time, account buying/sharing/giving usually go hand in hand with botting/CCFing/gold buying. 2 of my guild members sold their accounts. in 2 days, they were botting 24/7, buying tons of gold, and CCFing the shit outta their gear. its just a reputation account buyers are built upon.
i dont really care if u got the account or not. but if u start buying gold or botting of CCFing, then u dont deserve it at all. other than that, have fun with ur char.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hi_babe_
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:06 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 333 Location: o.O Is It BlackFox in mY aVa LOL !!!
|
Quote: 4. Purpose/Use and 3rd Party Partner Information Sharing
again. the first part is joymax the second part is billion.
par 1 = Joymax
part 2 = Billion
part 3 = Gaia
Billion ============> account =========> Gaia = part 3
3 part know/knew id and pw.
_________________ Black_babe_ 100% legit glavier lvl 80. Isis
o.O SeCreT wrote: "SP go back to your thread"
BlackFox wrote: @hi_babe_ ..You are smart now i see
|
|
Top |
|
 |
nightbloom
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:11 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 5492 Location:
|
hi_babe_ wrote: Quote: 4. Purpose/Use and 3rd Party Partner Information Sharing again. the first part is joymax the second part is billion. par 1 = Joymax part 2 = Billion part 3 = Gaia Billion ============> account =========> Gaia = part 3 3 part know/knew id and pw.
No, because Billion is no longer a part of the equation. He has removed himself and relinquished all control of the account to Gaia, willingly. Billion has been replaced with Gaia.
You are grasping at straws. LOL
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations: being a constant problem. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Crumpets
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:15 pm |
|
Forum Legend |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 7800 Location:
|
Dude, just don't take what any of these jerks have to say to heart. As long as billion was not botted who should give a shit?
You can't tell me NOT 1 of these haters have EVER let a friend look or play their account for like a minute. C'mon cut the crap.
Dude you go have fun with a fully pimped out char and make the best of it before the cap. Have fun ingame and on the forums.
P.S. Too all you haters, lol I sense jealousy ><
_________________ << banned for being a constant problem. -cin >>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Demarthl
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:21 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 2296
|
Dude! love that word.
I'm drunk! ... ish.. it's wearing off ¬_¬
but I was! and i just got back from ap arty celebratin my Dad's 50th! and i ate toffee fudge ice cream with whipped cream and chunks of flapjack!
Hells yeah!
so anyway, I come back, and like, wtf? 3 pages of wannabes orgasming over NB's territory and a few hump-me-please's trying to fit in here and there.
so yeah,
Gaia (cool name, mother earth) welcome to SRF, get used to this shit, it's as common as muck x3
_________________ <<banned from SRF for disrespect of the mod team and rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Silkrose
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:24 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 269 Location:
|
Deadly EYez wrote: Well now as i quit sro. if some friend asked me for my account i would give it to them.. And if not and i needed some cash i'd just sell it  flame me please, i don't give a crap. IMO, i was wrong when i started sro and Sro dosen't worth it. So i don't give a shit about the game anymore. and giving it to a friend would make me feel better. even selling it and getting back some of the money i wasted there is good.
Ok so can i have it? Lol, jk ^_-
Imagine me making a thread "Hi, Im the new Deadly__Eyez"
XD
_________________
Last edited by Silkrose on Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hi_babe_
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:25 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 333 Location: o.O Is It BlackFox in mY aVa LOL !!!
|
nightbloom wrote: hi_babe_ wrote: Quote: 4. Purpose/Use and 3rd Party Partner Information Sharing again. the first part is joymax the second part is billion. par 1 = Joymax part 2 = Billion part 3 = Gaia Billion ============> account =========> Gaia = part 3 3 part know/knew id and pw. No, because Billion is no longer a part of the equation. He has removed himself and relinquished all control of the account to Gaia, willingly. Billion has been replaced with Gaia. You are grasping at straws. LOL
lol you are distorting the Tos meaning, i m only copying it. i m sure you know that it s not legit and you only defend him because you know him. ^^. i m also sure that he is able to understand a TOS too. you 2 are just trying to give him a good image that's all^^
_________________ Black_babe_ 100% legit glavier lvl 80. Isis
o.O SeCreT wrote: "SP go back to your thread"
BlackFox wrote: @hi_babe_ ..You are smart now i see
|
|
Top |
|
 |
XuChu
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:26 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: here
|
hi_babe_ wrote: Quote: 4. Purpose/Use and 3rd Party Partner Information Sharing again. the first part is joymax the second part is billion. par 1 = Joymax part 2 = Billion part 3 = Gaia Billion ============> account =========> Gaia = part 3 3 part know/knew id and pw.
hey you! quit bitching!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
derblott
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:31 pm |
|
Hi, I'm New Here |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 9
|
Gaia you are trying to justify this by saying "you all would have accepted a free level 70 account too." Sorry, but anyone with an OUNCE of integrity wouldn't accept a free account. Period. It's like aimbotting in counterstrike...what's the point?
If you don't invest the time and effort to achieve a certain high level of play, you can't expect anyone to respect you when you achieve that level for free. Yea, maybe you're a cool guy behind the computer, who knows. Maybe we could go out and get some beers and have a great time....who knows. But in Silk Road, you are no better than a botter or ccfer. And sir these are silk road forums and you will be judged based on your actions related to silk road.
Quite frankly, you coming to these boards and asking for immediate respect and a warm welcome is offensive. Respect is earned, not given. Didn't your parents teach you anything?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Demarthl
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:33 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 2296
|
you wouldn't give a **** if Gaia was given a level 20 account.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for disrespect of the mod team and rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
lakestone
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:35 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Jun 2006 Posts: 109 Location:
|
Stop fooling around here babe!!
Can you please get ingame  We got a war like riight now - and logg into MSN pleaseeeee!!
_________________ <<Banned For Bot Admittance>> - Key-J
|
|
Top |
|
 |
hi_babe_
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:35 pm |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2006 Posts: 333 Location: o.O Is It BlackFox in mY aVa LOL !!!
|
XuChu wrote: hi_babe_ wrote: Quote: 4. Purpose/Use and 3rd Party Partner Information Sharing again. the first part is joymax the second part is billion. par 1 = Joymax part 2 = Billion part 3 = Gaia Billion ============> account =========> Gaia = part 3 3 part know/knew id and pw. hey you! quit bitching!
hi ! go back to your 9dragons shit lol
_________________ Black_babe_ 100% legit glavier lvl 80. Isis
o.O SeCreT wrote: "SP go back to your thread"
BlackFox wrote: @hi_babe_ ..You are smart now i see
|
|
Top |
|
 |
nightbloom
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:41 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 5492 Location:
|
hi_babe_ wrote: nightbloom wrote: hi_babe_ wrote: Quote: 4. Purpose/Use and 3rd Party Partner Information Sharing again. the first part is joymax the second part is billion. par 1 = Joymax part 2 = Billion part 3 = Gaia Billion ============> account =========> Gaia = part 3 3 part know/knew id and pw. No, because Billion is no longer a part of the equation. He has removed himself and relinquished all control of the account to Gaia, willingly. Billion has been replaced with Gaia. You are grasping at straws. LOL lol you are distorting the Tos meaning, i m only copying it. i m sure you know that it s not legit and you only defend him because you know him. ^^. i m also sure that he is able to understand a TOS too. you 2 are just trying to give him a good image that's all^^
Your little equation there is a blatant distortion. JoyMax does not prohibit the disclosure of account information, only that they do not address it as a legal entity in the event of loss. Using that to define Gaia as a third party is definately stretching the TOS beyond it's limit.
_________________ <<banned from SRF for rules violations: being a constant problem. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
GaiaX
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:42 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 150 Location:
|
derblott wrote: Gaia you are trying to justify this by saying "you all would have accepted a free level 70 account too." Sorry, but anyone with an OUNCE of integrity wouldn't accept a free account. Period. It's like aimbotting in counterstrike...what's the point?
If you don't invest the time and effort to achieve a certain high level of play, you can't expect anyone to respect you when you achieve that level for free. Yea, maybe you're a cool guy behind the computer, who knows. Maybe we could go out and get some beers and have a great time....who knows. But in Silk Road, you are no better than a botter or ccfer. And sir these are silk road forums and you will be judged based on your actions related to silk road.
Quite frankly, you coming to these boards and asking for immediate respect and a warm welcome is offensive. Respect is earned, not given. Didn't your parents teach you anything?
Sigh, next thing you know, JM offers you a lv70 Fully Farmed with everything SOX attached, you suddenly accept it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I thank everyone that is backing me up, because there is nothing to really argue about. Legit or not, I am the new owner, and I plan to build a new reputation. The flamers are so stuck in the past with the old and former Billions."Just forget about it.."
Again, I thank all that are welcoming me and so. I appreciate it. And Oh yeah, wasn't this thread for those who want to welcome me? Why all the sudden flaming (though I knew it was coming, but this is a welcoming thread) not a thread for you flamers to make your points, cause most of us don't care.
Ths account is given, I've experienced what most of you all have in grinding and leveling my ass off. I know how it's like, I am now Billion, the former owner now has nothing to do with this character. So why is there anymore reasons for you to keep flaming?
I really believe it is the person playing the character more than how the character was brought up. Like I stated, it's like saying people who didn't build their own houses and homes doesn't deserve to live in it. Though botters are different, they know hat they are doing and it's against the rules and it's not legit.
_________________
Last edited by GaiaX on Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Demarthl
|
Post subject: Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:44 pm |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 2296
|
wanan go get a coffee? this'll last a while :]
I'd strongly advise just ignoring the thread from now on, and post as normal, the flamers won't know shit from fudge in a day or two
_________________ <<banned from SRF for disrespect of the mod team and rules violations. -SG>>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|