Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Kangaxx · **Joined:** Jun 2008 **Posts:** 7 **Location:** Lithuania

I had this account registered for a long time, but i believe i haven't posted yet. Anyway, i was thinking of creating a Dagger Rogue or a Wizard for my new start. I remember back in the day invisibility pk2 edits were available. Is it still possible to do that? If so, i guess i'll have to roll with something else.

Gladiator_RN · **Posted:** Fri Nov 05, 2010 3:43 pm

It is still possible, but also still not allowed. ( you do have ingame skills also )

However, Rogue is still an awesome, and strong build. (Rogue/cleric)

S3by · **Joined:** Mar 2007 **Posts:** 519 **Location:**

Since hackshield filter patckets is not avalaible anymore , for now , at CTF , nobody can see me invizible

Kangaxx · **Joined:** Jun 2008 **Posts:** 7 **Location:** Lithuania

I'd hate to derail the thread, but can someone link me to a good rogue/cleric build (it'd nice if it wasn't outdated) and/or a wizard/x build?

_Equal_ · **Posted:** Fri Nov 05, 2010 6:12 pm

can only find this:

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=107616&start=0&hilit=rogue%2Fcleric+guide

wiz/bard isn't updated, but then again I spent two seconds searching:

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=100199&start=0&hilit=wizard+guide

wiz/cleric
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=78571&start=0&hilit=wizard+guide

Tasdik · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 13206 **Location:** Life

S3by wrote:

Since hackshield filter patckets is not avalaible anymore , for now , at CTF , nobody can see me invizible

I played like less then a month ago and people were still using the invis hack. Perhaps it has something to do with bot accounts?

apan · **Joined:** Feb 2009 **Posts:** 958 **Location:**

Yeah, can be done but it's "illegal" ^^

[Orphen] · **Posted:** Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:41 pm

I don't understand what you guys mean by "it's illegal." I'm pretty sure abusing a bug to benefit yourself and ruin the gameplay of others was alway "illegal." What makes using it any different now?

Not trolling, this is a legitimate question because this concept of "illegal" is puzzling me. What's different from "illegal" now, versus "illegal" three or four years ago?

Toasty · **Joined:** Feb 2007 **Posts:** 2568 **Location:**

Ya, most people will still see you when your invisible.

Dont bother me.. wizzs are stupid enough when you can see them anyway.

Gladiator_RN · **Posted:** Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:32 pm

[Orphen] wrote:

I don't understand what you guys mean by "it's illegal." I'm pretty sure abusing a bug to benefit yourself and ruin the gameplay of others was alway "illegal." What makes using it any different now?

Not trolling, this is a legitimate question because this concept of "illegal" is puzzling me. What's different from "illegal" now, versus "illegal" three or four years ago?

Then count botting, hacking, scamming also as "benefitting yourself"

[Orphen] · **Posted:** Tue Nov 16, 2010 5:34 am

Gladiator_RN wrote:

[Orphen] wrote:

I don't understand what you guys mean by "it's illegal." I'm pretty sure abusing a bug to benefit yourself and ruin the gameplay of others was alway "illegal." What makes using it any different now?

Not trolling, this is a legitimate question because this concept of "illegal" is puzzling me. What's different from "illegal" now, versus "illegal" three or four years ago?

Then count botting, hacking, scamming also as "benefitting yourself"

My question still stands, what is the difference? Botting then was illegal, as was hacking and scamming. How is it different now? From the original posts, it almost seems as if the term "illegal" has a double meaning.

I quit during a time when botting was illegal yet common. Back in 06 the word "bot" was taboo. So explain to me what the hell you mean by "illegal."

Goseki · **Joined:** Apr 2008 **Posts:** 3452 **Location:**

Considering kSRO is preparing an official bot, and the recent GM stating that they are not allowed to touch silk-buying bots, I think the taboo of bots being bad is slowly fading. It's kinda obvious to see that JM/We are going to work the bot in instead of lowering exp and sp req.

Invisibility-wise, rogues can be seen by bots and hacks. Wizards, normal invs is detected by hacks and bots, but it seems group invisible works the way it's meant to.

Most nubcakes don't know that so they only use the single invisible, then run out and get killed instantly.

In case someone wants to be a prick and point out how do I know all this, not hard if you know how to type and ask ppl, hang out at pvp areas all the time, and play with a wiz/rogue yourself. I've yet to be seen by other ppl when I use group invisible. Get raped every time I use single invisible.

Tasdik · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 13206 **Location:** Life

I've never actually experienced group invisibility in it's entirety. How many people does it turn invisible? The whole party? If so, why don't more people use it?

This is rather off topic, but meh.

[Orphen] · **Posted:** Tue Nov 16, 2010 7:10 am

Tasdik wrote:

I've never actually experienced group invisibility in it's entirety. How many people does it turn invisible? The whole party? If so, why don't more people use it?

This is rather off topic, but meh.

Whole party, as long as members are within a certain distance. It's not used as much because the cool down on it is longer than that of the single.

William-CL · **Joined:** Feb 2007 **Posts:** 7363 **Location:** N/A

Goseki wrote:

Considering kSRO is preparing an official bot, and the recent GM stating that they are not allowed to touch silk-buying bots, I think the taboo of bots being bad is slowly fading. It's kinda obvious to see that JM/We are going to work the bot in instead of lowering exp and sp req.

Plus that GM is STILL a GM lol..

Silkroad Online Forums

Back to SRO after ages! (small question about invisibility)

Who is online