Silkroad Online Forums

If all your friends have a 360 and you want to play with your friends..get a 360

Otherwise go with a ps3..with price no longer being a factor I cannot see why someone would pick the lesser console. I got a ps3 because I don't play with most of my friends (they sux) and because of the blu ray player..

A bit Off-Topic... I heard Sony made a promise that there wont be a "next-gen console" for the next 10 yeards,is it true? O_o

Code: Select all

...360

Well, I personally don't know anyone who owns a ps3, all of my friends play xbox 360, old and young..I too have a 360, and I gotta say it is worth it, and I've had mine since '07 and it's never broke etc...

I mean really I would buy a ps3 but it has NO exclusive titles I can think of that I would spend $400 to play, I mean really, I'm not a fanboy by any standards, I have both xbox, ps2, ps1, n64 etc..but seriously ps3 just plain sucks.

Ps3 is only 299..and has exclusives like

ratchet & clank
mgs
uncharted
killzone 2

the list goes on but most people i know play 1 game 99% of the time and thats MW2 which is for both consoles. Neither console sucks, sony just made the mistake of pricing theirs incredibly high when xbox was already out with many exclusives. Biased opinions increased exponentially and the whole 'omg if u own ps3 ur fanboy' thing came along..

You can say the same with the 360. TBH None of the exclusive titles impresses me nowadays. I also don't see why $400 and $300 makes a huge difference. If you buy games that adds up many times over than the system itself. If you rent/steal/borrow games then good for you.



This. Makes you wonder if the consoles(Wii,360,PS3) came out same time and same price. Who would be in the lead?



PS3 uses a host/client whereas 360 has servers and that the 360. Big difference

k, but EASHL.

@toshiharu, the ps3 would lead without a question. all hardware superiority aside the fanbase the ps2 had would net the kill.

No,the Wii would, Nintendo has a huge fanbase,because at the end,even XBox & Playstation fanboys have played Duck Hunt & Super Mario The real question is,if Sega was still making console,where whould they be hehe

Plus,even if the PS3 has more cores than the XBox360,there still hasn't been any game released that takes advantage of all of its cores.

BTW though, PS3 mistake wasn't about the pricing. It was the delays. XBOx360 simply was made on time and was shipped in time for Christmas. Then Microsoft was smart enough to have Halo 3 ready by Christmas again, before PS3 sales. Microsoft did everything right to give customers a reason to buy and Sony did everything to give customers a reason not to buy. With the delay, Microsoft had a year head start with exclusive games. Microsoft was also smart in ensuring they had a superior Online experience. Just look at the early reviews of Playstation Network, it was one dissapointment after another. Sony said they would do this and that and either simply did not do it or late. And when they did do it, they did it poorly. Sony only has themselves to blame. Overall I think they did it too late.

Why do I say too late. Well because potential buyers like myself now realize, we don't know anyone that has a PS3 and all our friends have an XBox. People like myself have an even greater and more important reason why not to buy a PS3 now. It doesn't matter how superior PS3 hardware is or the few exclusive titles to PS3.

The Playstation 3 missed big titles in the early stage after the release that made the PS1 and PS2 what they were. Combined with a higher price and being released way after the Xbox it was really tough to look appealing enough for gamers making a choice between consoles. The PS2 had Gran Turismo 3 and Final Fantasy X both a year after the launch, huge titles that drew gamers to the console. But for the PS3, years went by and the good games came out very sporadically and spread out, and GT5, FF, GoW and The Last Guardian have yet to be released.

Cant complain about the PS3's price now...
I have a 360, no problems so far
I'd probably get the PS3 slim too, now that its 299$

Having both, I simply like the 360 more.

I like the PS3, but there are features on the 360 that I prefer over Sony's console.

Also, no one here owns a ps3. Or at least it virtually seems that way.

Isn't there a 'next-gen console' out every 7 years?

your kidding about the graphics part right?
i dont even have to say
they have A LOT of exclusives: ratchet and clank, god of war, gran torismo, prototype, infamouse, little big planet, killzone 2, uncharted 2, metal gear 2, etc.
since when?
before this gen playstation had way way way more exclusives.
but now they have some of them
and you dont have to play ps3 home

its completely biased uneducated posts like these that ruin thread
<<Speaking of undedicated, that triple posting of yours isn't exactly make you look any smarter either. - Ru>>

easily ps3

Triple post ftw!!! Learn to multiquote lol >.< Also prototype isn't exclusive =p I like all of the ps3's exclusives (almost all of them) but I CBA to buy another console, games are expensive enough.

For those that are confusing PS3's "one console in 10 years" thing. What they meant was, while they will release another console, probably right around whenever Microsoft releases another one, they will keep support going for PS3 for 10 years. Unlike Microsoft who dropped all support for the original Xbox 2 days after Xbox360 came out.
Case in point: Games are still coming out for PS2, and that's been out a very long time now.

lolfanboy
No, i am not kidding about the graphics. Whatever differences there are, imo it comes down to the quality of your television. Ive seen picture comparisons and theres no significant difference, only noticeable difference is that one is more brighter or darker. I dont see the point of arguing about graphics of the same game on different consoles.
Does A LOT mean all of those you just listed? Or are you out of decent games to mention?
You dont need to tell me earlier playstations had more exclusives, i own all consoles except for the gamecube. But anyways, we are discussing this generation. btw, i think its funny that the GTA4 expansions are 360-exclusive. Money talks.

And yes, im aware you dont have to play PS3 home, im just disproving you and your point about PS3 being designed for the hardcore gamer. Im not gonna repeat my points about it. You can read over and try to understand later.



Looking over your posts, i lol'd. Oh the irony.

They're shitty expansions anyhow, but we all know why it's a 360 timed exclusive. Microsoft knows that if they slapped Rockstar with $50million dollars they would accept it. Smart move, but kinda goes to show how desperate Microsoft is getting. At least what I believe it seems.

GTA IV got released on xbox first too didn't it? O_o And the fact you don't like the DLC's doesn't mean it sucks at all, everywhere I look people are liking the 2 DLC's.

They were released on the same date.

Just my opinion on the expansions. Don't like it? Don't reply.

Paying money to get a game on a console is desperate? What the fuck is this world coming to?

I'm fed up with this childish fighting over consoles. Both are selling well, the proof that neither of the two is 'worthless crap'.
But apparently, some of you are apparently so unhappy with their console, that they try to make themselves feel better by ranting about the other, and still you claim you're not a fanboy?
Don't make me laugh.

To the creator of this thread, make up your mind. In the end, it's you who's buying a console, it's your decision.
If you're still not sure by then, there's Google showing you tons of these childish and unhelpful discussions.