Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Concerning INT Nuker Builds
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:34 am 
Hi, I'm New Here
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Location: In your pants
I'm powerfarming my low level nuker right now and I haven't decided if it would be better to go as a full force nuker with 90 lightning, 90 fire, and 90 cold....or to go with 90 lightning, 90 cold, and 90 bicheon (sword and shield).

My fiancee has a 68 force nuker with 90 cold, light and fire and he gets trashed by people of similar level in pvp even with good gear. So I was thinking I would keep bicheon for the shield benefits, extra defense and blocking ratio. This would be easier anyway since I wouldn't need to delevel bicheon.

I've heard that it's best just to go full force though....so I'd like some advice =/

_________________
Caffeine: The operating system of life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Concerning INT Nuker Builds
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:39 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 746
Location: BotRoad
90 Lightning/ice/bicheon 30 fire sounds great and you can tank more than another build.

_________________
Im hav best worior woalock ïn serwer.
Sûlkroad witout turqs ys byq joke.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Concerning INT Nuker Builds
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:41 pm 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1497
Location: Origin Online
PVP : You will need some weapon skills. The nukes cast too slow to take out players efficiently(unless you can one hit them). It is better to start out an attack with a nuke as they run towards you, then finish them off with faster casting weapon skills.

PVE : It's ok to have all force if you are only going to grind.

_________________
Origin Online
EdgeworthScoundrels


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Concerning INT Nuker Builds
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:27 pm 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1170
Location:
Tibet
chickenfeather wrote:
PVP : You will need some weapon skills. The nukes cast too slow to take out players efficiently(unless you can one hit them). It is better to start out an attack with a nuke as they run towards you, then finish them off with faster casting weapon skills.

PVE : It's ok to have all force if you are only going to grind.

About the PVE part, i always see people saying: nukes are not fast enough blabla. Does everyone forget shouts, or are they not that powerful/handy at higher lvls?

With my 42 nuker, they are really handy. Many opponents just go in a nuke + shout, sometimes 2 nukes.

_________________
Image
Thnx cin for sig & Hershey for avy :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Concerning INT Nuker Builds
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:16 pm 
Hi, I'm New Here
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7
Location: In your pants
oh yeah shouts rock :D that's why I'm going with lightning so I get lion shout ^___^

_________________
Caffeine: The operating system of life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Concerning INT Nuker Builds
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:34 am 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1354
Location:
Eldorado
I've tried a lvl 90 full force nuker and i can say... it sucks at PvP.... a lot
For PvE it's perfect, for plvl too... but if you wanna be strong enough for GW, FW and PvP go with something else.

_________________
Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Concerning INT Nuker Builds
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:05 am 
Frequent Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1060
Location:
Off Topic
Don't make a cookie cutter build. Go for something like:

90 Bicheon
90 Fire
90 Cold
30 Light

_________________
Image

ecSRO Highest Damage Contest v1.1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Concerning INT Nuker Builds
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 7:48 pm 
Casual Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 62
Location:
Oasis
OTG wrote:
Don't make a cookie cutter build. Go for something like:

90 Bicheon
90 Fire
90 Cold
30 Light


That build suggestion is actually extremely good. Weapons skills are always needed (especially s/s for a pure int). Furthermore, though you lose the magical damage increase buff (__ piercing force), it doesn't really matter: fire has higher % damage increases than lightning, so it's offset. And, At 30, I think you get the 5% one (I'm pulling that number out of my ass...but it's around there) and that would be a large damage increase. Ice is absolutely needed for defense (specifically the passive/buff/snow shield).

Good luck, and tell us what you choose to do.

_________________
Complete tools: Lempi willieb3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Concerning INT Nuker Builds
PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 7:55 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 17293
Location: Ghosting around
OTG wrote:
Don't make a cookie cutter build. Go for something like:

90 Bicheon
90 Fire
90 Cold
30 Light


That's my final plan. 80 bich/fire, 60 lit/cold atm. Going 90 bich/fire, 60 lit/cold ofcourse. And slowly decreasing lit and upping cold then.

If you want to grind only, or play in group pvp a full force nuker would be enough (with s/s ofcourse). But if you want to pvp even a little bit, you'd be better off taking bicheon with it. I've never seen anyone killing a semi geared char at 90 with only nukes.

_________________
Image
Props to chrisorg for the sig <3


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group