Questmaster wrote:
Euro 2 hand Warrior is a killer with a problem. Pure STR, uses Heavy Armor, AND VERY SLOW.. The Bard Sub is needed badly for speed,and for Noise.
I'm a Warrior/Warlock and use robes.
Warrior/clerics can also use robes
Also you can wear light armour which is 10% faster.
I think it's a waste of sp to pick a class solely for the speed lol. It's not like your're a rogue and just useless to party and must go bard to help...YOU ARE WARRIOR RAWR high def and such.
Cleric = more def, bless, ressurection, healing cycle, recovery divison, holyword
Warlock = debuffs, aoe debuffs making your foes weak then ripping them to bits.
Bard = Running fast and noise (although your high def makes mobs not that much of a problem and in party you're suppose to tank...so yet again no point in noise not to mention some mobs are not even aggresive)
Most warriors use their subclasses to help them in pvp. No clue what the hell bard subclass would help...runing fast yes..but you shouldn't be running away lol.
Rogue bard although not perfection is good for crossbow because they can run away from you at the speed of a horse when you are apporaching them. Get the range on you and shoot you to death. Warrior bard would only be good at catching them lol.
Bard works well with Wizards for better solo training. Bard class alone for int based chars has good attacking speed. Also the tambour is helpful (something a warriior wouldn't be using in a party or by themsevles). Bard Cleric is even an okay class. Not so sure about warlock/bard lol xD.
Basically I just don't see the point in a bard subclass. Running fast is fine and dandy but at many times extra defence or making your enemies weaker will lead to you not dieing more often then being able to run around (which is only good for getting away from someone higher lvl then you or for jobs).