|
Silkroad Online
|
Silkroad Forums
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 23 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
rinleez
|
Post subject: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:20 am |
|
New Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 26 Location:
|
Guys i need some opinions of high lvl (im an high lvl as well) Im thinking of an masspvp dmg dealer ( NO EURO!) and i thought than full int with fire, light nukes maxed out and ice 90 multishot would be really hard nuking with mana shield on his back. I know its gonna kinda suck on pvp but.. should i give it a try? I know maxed out fire nukes are little weaker than light nueks but it would be rly powerful to use new light and new fire nukes in a row  i made a detailed calculations. using 3light nukes=591 Using 2fire + light nukes=690 THATS LVL 90 (the points are made out ofmy calculations, you may not get it ^^) Another good thing - Mag Def buffs protect u from other ints a little and u can have fire fortress. LVL 100 Dmg calculations: 2fire nueks 1 light nuke = 930 light nukes= just 600! AND REMEMBER YOU HAVE MORE DMG WITH FIRE IMBUE
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Nitro
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:25 pm |
|
Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 4769 Location:
|
What kind of math is that? lol ... care to explain? Anyway ... I think you'll regreat it ... for building that build ...
_________________  Thanks Noobs_Slayer for signature.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
rinleez
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:42 pm |
|
New Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 26 Location:
|
sry i wont explain its just detaield calculation of what dmg the nueks will do ;]
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Shadow
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:25 pm |
|
Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 1039 Location: lolwut
|
That's a "detailed calculation?" Seems like random numbers that make no sense. Anyway, fire imbue + fire nukes + light mag att buff + spear = best chinese nuke power. Light-ice-fire nuker is good for PvE and mass pvp, and sucks in 1vs1 pvp.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Mishiru
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:34 pm |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Jul 2008 Posts: 183 Location: Far Far Away =)
|
would be great xD i think that the nukers who are multi imbue are the best. you can use ligth to pwlv or jobbing. fire for pvp and trainig and ice for pvp and trainig of bot hunting xD best chinese dmg dealer full int = full force nukers(i mean ice ligth fire) best dmg dealer str chinese= bower xD ( coz im bow  )
|
|
Top |
|
 |
jyushinshuu
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 2:29 pm |
|
Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 1235 Location:
|
are u really high lv? since when did lightning nukes are more powerful than fire? ans: only at lv30 nukes.
u see lightning nukes multiplier stays at 300% while fire nukes are 315% at flame wave hellfire and 330% at flame wave bomb at lv14 or higher.
and new book of fire at lv96 at 330%.
fire nukes are always stronger + light nukes does very unstable dmg due far damaage range.
and YES you are building the right skill. GO for fire/light/cold maxed. you will have absolute defense and offense.
and NO you will not suck on 1on1 fight. because there will be no new pots at 100cap meaning it takes a lot of time to regen huge HP. Mostly i've seen pure nuker owns at lv90+ in cSRO.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
JoyFax
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:32 pm |
|
Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 1095 Location: PORTUGAL
|
Nitro wrote: Anyway ... I think you'll regreat it ... for building that build ... Or maybe not, why do people on this forum always want WEAPON + force? I know a full int fire light cold spear on tibet and he is pretty strong
_________________ Currently on EliteSRO
Rogue lvl 5x Warlock lvl 1x
|
|
Top |
|
 |
rinleez
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:59 pm |
|
New Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 26 Location:
|
thx a lot guys for ur opinion ill make this build  anyway its the most deffensive and offensive chinese int build
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
houbaa
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:21 pm |
|
Casual Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 52 Location:
|
I tried it and its a really good build for pve but also for pvp because you have light for your parry, ice for phy def and fire for mag def and really high damage with fire imbue You wont regret having a build only a few people on your server have 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
CLOT
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:49 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 825 Location:
|
u wouldnt regret it when u dun have any 1 single disabling skills fire imbue + max light + fre nuke does deal the most dmg in any cap, but w/o weapon mastery, u cant do a thing when u are disabled, and nuke casting time is longer than most weapon moves, ie. disabled easily s/s, blader, KD spear, glaive stun, KB, dull bow KB whenever they see u trying to nuke, stun euro...blah blah blah even more disabling skills/status its good in group fight & pve, juz hide behind ur tanks in party in job/fw and nuke but 1v1 pvp 
_________________ found some aim in life, something more important waiting for me
|
|
Top |
|
 |
JoyFax
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:02 pm |
|
Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 1095 Location: PORTUGAL
|
CLOT wrote: but 1v1 pvp  Bullshit
_________________ Currently on EliteSRO
Rogue lvl 5x Warlock lvl 1x
|
|
Top |
|
 |
_BoBsk1ee_
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:28 pm |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 180 Location: NL
|
CLOT wrote: u wouldnt regret it when u dun have any 1 single disabling skills fire imbue + max light + fre nuke does deal the most dmg in any cap, but w/o weapon mastery, u cant do a thing when u are disabled, and nuke casting time is longer than most weapon moves, ie. disabled easily s/s, blader, KD spear, glaive stun, KB, dull bow KB whenever they see u trying to nuke, stun euro...blah blah blah even more disabling skills/status its good in group fight & pve, juz hide behind ur tanks in party in job/fw and nuke but 1v1 pvp  It's true accept it, full force nukers sck at 1 vs 1 trust me 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
NuclearSilo
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 3:55 pm |
|
Forum God |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Age of Wushu
|
jyushinshuu wrote: and NO you will not suck on 1on1 fight. because there will be no new pots at 100cap meaning it takes a lot of time to regen huge HP. Mostly i've seen pure nuker owns at lv90+ in cSRO. Indeed, but the recovery grain 25% HP of pure str is not shit ~~ 8-9k HP each 4s
_________________ Playing Age of Wushu, dota IMBA
|
|
Top |
|
 |
CLOT
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 5:48 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 825 Location:
|
dude1977956 wrote: JoyFax wrote: CLOT wrote: but 1v1 pvp  Bullshit agreed the topic is on fire/light/cold 100, not force/light/cold 100 and fire/light/cold 100 SUCKS in 1v1 pvp prove me wrong wif reasons/video/explanation, or maybe wif your 2 pigs' brains? Bullshit w/o a reason proves u two are bullshit indeed
_________________ found some aim in life, something more important waiting for me
|
|
Top |
|
 |
BabyBoy
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:27 am |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 119 Location:
|
M3K0S wrote: if pure force nukers suck then u must also mean that wizards suck because they have to cast the nuke quick before they get killed... and i used to have a capped s/s all force nuker and it wasnt that bad... i actually owned cuz the blocks on the shield made it so i wouldnt be knocked back.... You forget though, wizards have invisibility that is how they avoid these disables as they tend to strike first...
|
|
Top |
|
 |
penfold1992
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:41 am |
|
Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 4060 Location:
|
i am this build. i dnt often die 1 on 1 i hav full int gear and a good spear which means i usually 1 hit every1, bless can be a pain with pure str's but i can tank1 person with s/s
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
LockStar.
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:18 am |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jun 2007 Posts: 948 Location:
|
CLOT wrote: the topic is on fire/light/cold 100, not force/light/cold 100
and fire/light/cold 100 SUCKS in 1v1 pvp
prove me wrong wif reasons/video/explanation, or maybe wif your 2 pigs' brains?
Bullshit w/o a reason proves u two are bullshit indeed
Exactly..
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
whiteraven
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:12 pm |
|
Active Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 561 Location: dasfsss
|
they dont suck that hard,, you know why,? because most peeps dont even have a pvp tactic you get pwned by str every time over and over again  i have fire/light/cold s/s with sos gear and s/s i suck in pvp, i pretty much suck in group pvp (ctf) but im a awesome dmg dealer in pve 
_________________ WTS,,
water elements D3/4 fire elements D3/4 earth elements D3/4 wind elements D3/4
and a few sos´es,, look at topic http://www.silkroadforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=91081
|
|
Top |
|
 |
vermillion
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:31 am |
|
Regular Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 237 Location: mistymountaintop
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Shadow
|
Post subject: Re: Controversial Full Int FireLightCold 100 Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:51 am |
|
Frequent Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 1039 Location: lolwut
|
vermillion wrote: will the weapon mastery affect the damage of nukes? If so then why choose 100firelightcold? I asked the same question here: http://www.silkroadforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=97232No, weapon masteries don't affect the damage nukes do. Light-ice-fire equipped with a spear is probably the most damaging nuker build, since you get fire imbue and nukes as well as the mag damage buff from light.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 23 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|