I almost wish...

0l3n · **Posted:** Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:21 am

Well it sux that people like 12 (who only got banned based on a 15 second wall hump) get banned and there isnt a chance in hell they can come back.

/Pi · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 4592 **Location:**

All 15k members are contributing helpful tips, guides, tutorials, answers, to everyone. All 15k members are botting and multi-clienting 20 characters, buying gold, no-DC, invis/stealth hack.

Oh my, whatever shall we do?

TOloseGT · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 7129 **Location:**

15k minus 1, me =]

Belgarath · **Joined:** Jun 2006 **Posts:** 1745 **Location:**

/wrist some more. If they bot, they should be banned, no questions asked.

Tokughavita · **Joined:** Apr 2006 **Posts:** 789 **Location:**

Belgarath wrote:

/wrist some more. If they bot, they should be banned, no questions asked.

quite surprising to hear this coming from you, Belgarath...

Belgarath · **Joined:** Jun 2006 **Posts:** 1745 **Location:**

Tokughavita wrote:

Belgarath wrote:

/wrist some more. If they bot, they should be banned, no questions asked.

quite surprising to hear this coming from you, Belgarath...

Enlighten me. Please.

LockStar. · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 948 **Location:**

echo wrote:

Good people or not, mod or Farking 1 post user I dont give a ****. botter is botter, even if that means many people will be banned, even better.

You seem to have a strong position about this. Can I ask.. WHAT THE **** have you dane for this community that is so great, to decide that Good people or mods should be banned.

Do you even know who Deacon is you goddamn hypocrite. :banghead:

Zing · **Joined:** Dec 2006 **Posts:** 568 **Location:**

LockStar, I believe he pretty much got it right. Even SuicideGrl said something similar.

SuicideGrl wrote:

LEGIT = LEGIT. there IS no fcking grey area.

NuclearSilo · **Posted:** Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:50 am

He has a big mouth. If one day, he find out that his friends bots, he will sure piss all of them of no matter what

IceCrash · **Posted:** Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:36 pm

omfg
so much emo sh1t
Just hf with the drama and enjoy watching those hoes crying liek pussies when they get caught HARHARHAHR

No seriously, who cares.
Botter = Banned
Banned = Funny
Funny = Cute
Cute = Ito
Ito= Banned

Zomg :o
I JAST DISCUVER DA CIRCLEZ OF BATS!

Ok, so what i really wanted to post is that, even you want silkroad not to be corrupt, you don't play along, even if its on a forum.
i juokes kekeke

Priam · **Posted:** Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:47 pm

IceCrash wrote:

omfg
so much emo sh1t
Just hf with the drama and enjoy watching those hoes crying liek pussies when they get caught HARHARHAHR

No seriously, who cares.
Botter = Banned
Banned = Funny
Funny = Cute
Cute = Ito
Ito= Banned

Zomg :o
I JAST DISCUVER DA CIRCLEZ OF BATS!

Ok, so what i really wanted to post is that, even you want silkroad not to be corrupt, you don't play along, even if its on a forum.
i juokes kekeke

....

....

Yo sin, i refrained from flamin! give cookie.

dannoob · **Joined:** Nov 2007 **Posts:** 556 **Location:**

though i understand the mods wishes to have a bot free forum, and you cant satisfy everyone. i find that the purpose of having a silk road forum is to discuss about silkroad. ideas, strategies, builds etc. so to ban helpful members i find sort of destroys the forum more than closet botters. but thats my view.

echo · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 189 **Location:** Lv

LockStar. wrote:

echo wrote:

Good people or not, mod or Farking 1 post user I dont give a ****. botter is botter, even if that means many people will be banned, even better.

You seem to have a strong position about this. Can I ask.. WHAT THE **** have you dane for this community that is so great, to decide that Good people or mods should be banned.

Do you even know who Deacon is you goddamn hypocrite. :banghead:

I can't decide anything, just like you can't moron. I am just stating rules of forum, which there are, no matter what has person done he will be banned if caught botting.

And I don't give a shit who is Deacon. If some one will get exposed he will get banned, easy as that. If he won't, because of few crybabies like Lockstar whos heart is breaking cause people get banned or whatever, then all this war on bots is bullshit.

And I did not say Deacon is botting and should get banned in last part, I said about bottters in general. So I put this that even some one like Lockstar can understand, if your friends are botters and some one manage to expose them, then prepare for crying more, cause your friends also will be leaving, and not you, not me can do shit about that. but you will see more and more people banned.

heroo · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 6618 **Location:**

it's all about hypocrisy.

people screaming for massive bot ban on SRF, but when it begins to hurt, they're like: ''Actually botting isn't that bad, they contributed a lot to this forum.''

TOloseGT · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 7129 **Location:**

lol, bot sympathizers make funnies

LockStar. · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 948 **Location:**

echo wrote:

LockStar. wrote:

echo wrote:

Good people or not, mod or Farking 1 post user I dont give a ****. botter is botter, even if that means many people will be banned, even better.

You seem to have a strong position about this. Can I ask.. WHAT THE **** have you dane for this community that is so great, to decide that Good people or mods should be banned.

Do you even know who Deacon is you goddamn hypocrite. :banghead:

I can't decide anything, just like you can't moron. I am just stating rules of forum, which there are, no matter what has person done he will be banned if caught botting.

And I don't give a shit who is Deacon. If some one will get exposed he will get banned, easy as that. If he won't, because of few crybabies like Lockstar whos heart is breaking cause people get banned or whatever, then all this war on bots is bullshit.

And I did not say Deacon is botting and should get banned in last part, I said about bottters in general. So I put this that even some one like Lockstar can understand, if your friends are botters and some one manage to expose them, then prepare for crying more, cause your friends also will be leaving, and not you, not me can do shit about that. but you will see more and more people banned.

I have no friends on this forums.

I am just observing how little fucktards like you who did absolutely nothing for this forum run around Stating the forum rules.

Well, guess what. WE KNOW THE RULES. :banghead:

echo · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 189 **Location:** Lv

Yes you have done something to this forum, now you are immune from getting banned. Oh please go cry at moms place kiddo.

PR0METHEUS · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 4093 **Location:** Earth

Key-J wrote:

These "witch hunts" as you so call them, who was the driving force behind it? Who were the ones who asked for it? Who were the ones who were sick of all these "Closet Botters" as they were so called.

I'll tell you who, everyone and anyone who has ever borne the forum rank of "Regular User"

Thats right, it was all because the users kept complaining to the Staff that there were too many bots, that so and so is a botter, but we just let him/her go on like nothing.

So we decided to listen to your pleads and comments, we listen to your criticisms and complaints and we did something about it.....
<snip>

I couldn't have said it better myself. Some people just can't be happy no matter what the mod team does.

LockStar. wrote:

echo wrote:

Good people or not, mod or Farking 1 post user I dont give a ****. botter is botter, even if that means many people will be banned, even better.

You seem to have a strong position about this. Can I ask.. WHAT THE **** have you dane for this community that is so great, to decide that Good people or mods should be banned.

Do you even know who Deacon is you goddamn hypocrite. :banghead:

Good people, especially mods, should be banned - after enough research to ensure it's not just a false report - if they are caught botting. Why? Those people should know better. They should know what the rules are and that botting isn't acceptable.

/Pi · **Joined:** May 2007 **Posts:** 4592 **Location:**

PR0METHEUS wrote:

Good people, especially mods, should be banned - after enough research to ensure it's not just a false report - if they are caught botting. Why? Those people should know better. They should know what the rules are and that botting isn't acceptable.

+1

Another reason is the position of mods. Mods are the role-models of every board. If the community allows a mod (a role-model) to bot, the members would perceive botting to be acceptable. The end result: everyone's going to start botting.

†erminal · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 1138 **Location:**

Lockstar, i'll be your friend.
Kmon guys its an INTERNET GAME FORUM.
If you really miss these people get msn or something.
If someone gets caught botting, well shame on them.
If your going around pretending to be a spy taking together pictures viewing other forums, taking suspects, gathering intel, monitoring bot areas, well shame on you.
This is a legit game, *family friendly* forum, don't like it get the feck out

Priam · **Posted:** Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:15 am

Prophet Izaach wrote:

PR0METHEUS wrote:

Good people, especially mods, should be banned - after enough research to ensure it's not just a false report - if they are caught botting. Why? Those people should know better. They should know what the rules are and that botting isn't acceptable.

+1

Another reason is the position of mods. Mods are the role-models of every board. If the community allows a mod (a role-model) to bot, the members would perceive botting to be acceptable. The end result: everyone's going to start botting.

People still have minds of there own you know? The mods on this board are NOT Britney Spears equivalents.

PR0METHEUS · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 4093 **Location:** Earth

Priam wrote:

People still have minds of there own you know? The mods on this board are NOT Britney Spears equivalents.

Of course people have minds of their own. People won't necessarily start botting just because they see SRF mods, especially the more popular/visible ones, botting. However, if for example cin, Key-J, SuicideGrl started botting, what kind of message would that send to the SRF community?

What kind of message would it send if, even though they start botting, they are allowed to remain members of these forums, the forums that they have worked hard at making into, and maintaining as legit forums. The mods are supposed to be role models. They are supposed to stand for what is right, and enforce it in others as well. Their botting shouldn't be allowed to slide just because they have done such a wonderful job being mods and helping the community through all this time. Rules are rules.

Priam · **Posted:** Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:38 pm

PR0METHEUS wrote:

Priam wrote:

People still have minds of there own you know? The mods on this board are NOT Britney Spears equivalents.

Of course people have minds of their own. People won't necessarily start botting just because they see SRF mods, especially the more popular/visible ones, botting. However, if for example cin, Key-J, SuicideGrl started botting, what kind of message would that send to the SRF community?

What kind of message would it send if, even though they start botting, they are allowed to remain members of these forums, the forums that they have worked hard at making into, and maintaining as legit forums. The mods are supposed to be role models. They are supposed to stand for what is right, and enforce it in others as well. Their botting shouldn't be allowed to slide just because they have done such a wonderful job being mods and helping the community through all this time. Rules are rules.

I fully agree,

my post was aimed at the idiocy of Prophet's post.

nothing more, nothing less.

PR0METHEUS · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 4093 **Location:** Earth

redneck wrote:

Snudge or Priam for mod....

Well the "MOD" tag does look nice above one's avatar.

borat2 · **Posted:** Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:36 pm

LockStar. wrote:

echo wrote:

Good people or not, mod or Farking 1 post user I dont give a ****. botter is botter, even if that means many people will be banned, even better.

You seem to have a strong position about this. Can I ask.. WHAT THE **** have you dane for this community that is so great, to decide that Good people or mods should be banned.

Do you even know who Deacon is you goddamn hypocrite. :banghead:

you got the joymax mentality "these people bot but they do buy silk, lets not ban them"

there should be no exceptions who get banned, the choice is yours if you want to be a part of this witch hunt or not.

Blindfire · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 3844 **Location:** ...

Deacon only got banned for 7 days because of a no-DC client, not a perm for botting.

nightbloom · **Joined:** Jan 2006 **Posts:** 5492 **Location:**

Tokughavita wrote:

I represent the forumers in the days of Moogie and demarthyl and hakufudomine and kurohagane and helsharpt and many other greats, in the days where this place had a strong community of active, experienced helpers that had great stories and screenshots and topics and videos

Isnt it ironic that the ppl you mention all quit playing because of bots in the game or an inability to log in which is cause by bots in the game.

And if your problem is quality topics, why dont you start at home and start making topics that are interesting and discussion worthy?

hitokiri · **Joined:** Feb 2006 **Posts:** 3503 **Location:** here

played daily with hellsharpt, kurohagne and hakufudomine, and yea as NB said they moved to WoW or other games because they couldnt take the bots and got bored of dealing with them. They all enjoyed it in the days when seeing a bot wasnt as common as seeing a Penon on the Ice. At least on Venus there is something to look forward when you get in past the traffic, and can find a spot to grind past the botters. Only reason I play

Azilius · **Joined:** Oct 2006 **Posts:** 4236 **Location:** CS:GO

Blindfire wrote:

Deacon only got banned for 7 days because of a no-DC client, not a perm for botting.

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3098

Priam · **Posted:** Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:02 pm

Azilius wrote:

Blindfire wrote:

Deacon only got banned for 7 days because of a no-DC client, not a perm for botting.

memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=3098

that was added later, read the anouncements.

Silkroad Online Forums

I almost wish...

Who is online