Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Gamer
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:05 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 918
Location:
Artist Corner
for SOTW

Image

yea, still trying new stuff out


edit:
Image

as for the grass being slanted, i tipped the whole sig, and extended the sky by hand, the render didnt fit my sig size

_________________
Image
Image
_____________________!!!!!!Rogue 7X !!!!!!
Image


Last edited by aazumak on Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:12 pm 
Loyal Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1637
Location: 206
Looks LQ. Overall it needs more depth. Balance out the tones better. The kid on the grass looks weird to me. The grass cuts off and slops, yet the kid stays the same. Just doesn't look right. I like that you're trying out different styles, as i'm doing the same.

_________________
Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:44 am 
Common Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 190
Location:
Artist Corner
For me I say that the effect of the laptop doesn't look good cuz it look like it's busted.

_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:10 pm 
Ex-Staff
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5607
Location: darkroot garden
Not really liking this one, because the effekts around him look fsfsdf..


The outline of the boy looks like you cut him out with a soft brush.

_________________
Image
<3
0len


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:16 pm 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3473
Location: Stuntin'.
At least he's stepping out of his usual style and I'm liking it. Try experimenting more with this. Anywho, the colors are awesome. Nice text placement too. I'd pick a different stock though lol :P

_________________
Image



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:36 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3216
Location: wat
The new AC fad: "It looks LQ."

:P

_________________
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:44 pm 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3119
Location: Canada,On
Waisha wrote:
The new AC fad: "It looks LQ."

:P

Thank you.

It seems like people are just looking for something to bitch about the sig. I get it " ...in a GFX forum they're more harsh...they're this...they're that" blah blah fikkity blah. You know what though I remember when people used to get referred to SRF AC because we're not like other GFX sites. We tell you what you need to know to improve without all the bitchy-ness ( yes that's a word =P).

Now I'm not saying be all lovey touchy feely just don't bash the sig like it's shit right off the bat.

Anyway, I don't see a problem with the quality of the pic. Just seem's a bit empty to me and I do agree with HOLLA on the slope. It seems a bit odd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:11 pm 
Loyal Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1637
Location: 206
It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

_________________
Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:30 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3216
Location: wat
HOLLAstir wrote:
It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

How's this stock LQ? :P

_________________
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:33 pm 
Loyal Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1637
Location: 206
Waisha wrote:
HOLLAstir wrote:
It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.

How's this stock LQ? :P

Well they either choose LQ stocks, or the effects they do to it, makes it appear LQ. Forgot to add the last part.

_________________
Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:36 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2133
Location: .........
What is this weeks SOTW theme? i never can find it :x :x :x :x :x :x mad, i'm mad :x


Nice sig btw :) :D

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:44 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2133
Location: .........
Hershey wrote:
deep.in wrote:
What is this weeks SOTW theme? i never can find it :x :x :x :x :x :x mad, i'm mad :x


Nice sig btw :) :D


The new theme for the new week is Video Games.


But,but but but where is topic? i cant find it :( And thx :) :love:

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:49 pm 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3119
Location: Canada,On
HOLLAstir wrote:
It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.


"Harsh" were your's and Faiiens words in numerous threads. Only one I can think of right off the top of my head was the "Rainbow" thread by BS. Anyway, they're just honest you're right. I'm done.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:51 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2133
Location: .........
Oh my :oops: i tought Sig Wars is 1vs1 :oops: Sorry :oops:

_________________
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:52 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 918
Location:
Artist Corner
yes, my stock is average size, kinda small, but not horrible quality, but my sharpen effect on lighten made it look LQ

i realize it now, but it seemed good at first

_________________
Image
Image
_____________________!!!!!!Rogue 7X !!!!!!
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:05 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3216
Location: wat
I also think the LQ look could be beacause of the blue effect interfering with the edges of the stock. I like the sig alot though. Awesome flow.

_________________
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:24 pm 
Loyal Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1637
Location: 206
Hostage wrote:
HOLLAstir wrote:
It's only a "fad" because people are choosing low quality stocks. Other gfx sites aren't "harsh" they're just honest.


"Harsh" were your's and Faiiens words in numerous threads. Only one I can think of right off the top of my head was the "Rainbow" thread by BS. Anyway, they're just honest you're right. I'm done.

I only say "harsh" because thats how people here take it.

_________________
Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gamer
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:06 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 838
Location:
Uranus
lol, imo it looks like you made his smile go from :) to "WTF WHY ISNT THIS WORKING!????"

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group