Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:58 am 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 659
Location:
Alps
At 100 CAP.

Taking up Prot would give more Def Increase or Taking Up Ice Mastery?

What I meant was, If I am a lvl 100 FF Bow with Garment.
Would Prot give me more Phy Def Increase or taking up ICE Mastery.

_________________
<< banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:05 am 
Common Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 184
Location:
Troy
Ice would. Passive is 178 and buff is 158. That's 336 more phys def. Prot doesn't even come close.

_________________
Lvl 94 Full Warrior Warlock
Lvl 100 Str Archer
Lvl 94 Int S&S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:07 am 
Loyal Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1751
Location: In your house, stealing your Dew.
SirSengir wrote:
Ice would. Passive is 178 and buff is 158. That's 336 more phys def. Prot doesn't even come close.

but wut do you know, you're always stoned sir.


oh, n i want screenie of stats on sasan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:13 am 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 29
Location: Italy, Rome
If u got a 100 Full strong , up 20 lvl of ice , and use Garment ^^.

_________________
New Sig .. xD

Gius3ppe lvl 97 warrior gap 7
Sfeptor lvl 97 s / s gap 7


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:57 am 
Veteran Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3203
Location: England
Should be in Questions and Answers, but we can work around that.

Imo, if you want extra phy defence you should use garment and have 80 light, 20 cold. That wil give you a small amount of phy def and 20% snow shield.

But lets face it, you will be a typical 94+ bowman and spam knockback, so who cares about a little extra phy defense, honestly?

_________________
Image
Saddam✓ Osama✓ Gaddafi✓ Justin Bieber☐ Rebecca Black☐


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:01 am 
New Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 26
Location: Promised Lands
You cant stand a chance against int chars, unless your head chest legs are sun. Garment is better choice. if you think that you wont use phantom/shadow skillz on light, then cold instead of light is better choice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:57 pm 
Senior Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4060
Location:
Uranus
ice is by far but if its a choice between ice or prot it has to be prot. u can change to prot any time u want. you cant change a mastery when ever u want...

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:41 pm 
Valued Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 458
Location: Valhalla
kukreknecmi wrote:
You cant stand a chance against int chars, unless your head chest legs are sun. Garment is better choice. if you think that you wont use phantom/shadow skillz on light, then cold instead of light is better choice.


ur are dead wrong my friend, I have lvl98-100 prot set, I don't even need snow shield vs nukers, regular pots+vigors work fine, even str with garment use vigors vs nukers so i don't see the problem, at least have proof before making blunt statements, they don't even come close, so im sure a lvl 96 chest/legs works just as fine, pure str+vigors+pills=kills all int. jewels is ur best defense vs nukers, test it urself,
prot, will give better defense then max ice, ice gives pure phy. def, if you factor prot phy. def and phy, reinforce, prot is better.

_________________
Are you so foolish as to not realize your own impotence? -Freya.
This ritual demands a sacrifice, and I can think of none more enticing than you...,Repent, for death is upon you -Arch Demon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:07 am 
Valued Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 364
Location:
Hera
Lempi wrote:
Should be in Questions and Answers, but we can work around that.

Imo, if you want extra phy defence you should use garment and have 80 light, 20 cold. That wil give you a small amount of phy def and 20% snow shield.

But lets face it, you will be a typical 94+ bowman and spam knockback, so who cares about a little extra phy defense, honestly?


I lol'ed.

Its so true.. i watch bowers pvp.. and as soon as a nuker/glavie/warrior actaully begins to hurt then.. its KB,KB,KB,KB,KB > ATTACK < .. Or.. its just phantom and run.. silly really..

But, OT: I think the ice is better.. depending on the +"0" of the actuall prot set, not forgetting the infamous white stats...

_________________
.:: Current Status ::.
Current Level: 103 ~ 54,45%

.:: SP Remaining ::.
273,000

.:: Dual Weapon ::.
103 Pacheon ~ FF 102
102 Bicheon ~ FF 102
103 Fire ~ FF 103

# Current Speed Drug Cost, Don't Ask!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:50 am 
Valued Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 352
Location:
Gaia
TheSlink wrote:
Lempi wrote:
Should be in Questions and Answers, but we can work around that.

Imo, if you want extra phy defence you should use garment and have 80 light, 20 cold. That wil give you a small amount of phy def and 20% snow shield.

But lets face it, you will be a typical 94+ bowman and spam knockback, so who cares about a little extra phy defense, honestly?


I lol'ed.

Its so true.. i watch bowers pvp.. and as soon as a nuker/glavie/warrior actaully begins to hurt then.. its KB,KB,KB,KB,KB > ATTACK < .. Or.. its just phantom and run.. silly really..

But, OT: I think the ice is better.. depending on the +"0" of the actuall prot set, not forgetting the infamous white stats...


That's what I do. I'm a pure INT archer. I don't have a shield. Arrow combos ARE my shield. Xbowers and wizards go down like trash. As for other builds, that's the only way I stay alive.

Don't like constant KB? Too bad! It's in the game... deal with it.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:24 am 
Advanced Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2153
Location:
Off Topic
And bladers have KD...and Hueskal have extra hp passive...its the game guys deal with it...bowers dont have extra defense from shield or some kind of hp passive...its about time they got something worth while.. And that statement that guy made about the prot and dieing easily against int...that is so wrong my friend..im full prot and I pvped a lvl 100 a pure nuker with +7 s/s FF and garms +5 last tier...and I beat him. Firewall is your best friend :P Of course that was back when I was 96 with 94-96 gear... now i have a full blue +5 96-99 set..

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:39 am 
Valued Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 364
Location:
Hera
loveisintheair wrote:
TheSlink wrote:
Lempi wrote:
Should be in Questions and Answers, but we can work around that.

Imo, if you want extra phy defence you should use garment and have 80 light, 20 cold. That wil give you a small amount of phy def and 20% snow shield.

But lets face it, you will be a typical 94+ bowman and spam knockback, so who cares about a little extra phy defense, honestly?


I lol'ed.

Its so true.. i watch bowers pvp.. and as soon as a nuker/glavie/warrior actaully begins to hurt then.. its KB,KB,KB,KB,KB > ATTACK < .. Or.. its just phantom and run.. silly really..

But, OT: I think the ice is better.. depending on the +"0" of the actuall prot set, not forgetting the infamous white stats...


That's what I do. I'm a pure INT archer. I don't have a shield. Arrow combos ARE my shield. Xbowers and wizards go down like trash. As for other builds, that's the only way I stay alive.

Don't like constant KB? Too bad! It's in the game... deal with it.



*Whahahah*

Calm down, i was just saying how people overuse the skill.. If people had a brain and didnt spam KB and actually attack.. Because spamming knockback on a say glavier.. wont even touch his HP.. whilst your dieing.. Silly.. because the glavier will keep comming and your keeping dieing.. use 1 or 2 knockbacks... then attack again.. Remember you need to kill your target as well..

_________________
.:: Current Status ::.
Current Level: 103 ~ 54,45%

.:: SP Remaining ::.
273,000

.:: Dual Weapon ::.
103 Pacheon ~ FF 102
102 Bicheon ~ FF 102
103 Fire ~ FF 103

# Current Speed Drug Cost, Don't Ask!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT
PostPosted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:17 am 
Common Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 140
Location:
Iris
loveisintheair wrote:
That's what I do. I'm a pure INT archer. I don't have a shield. Arrow combos ARE my shield. Xbowers and wizards go down like trash. As for other builds, that's the only way I stay alive.

Don't like constant KB? Too bad! It's in the game... deal with it.


Im one of those Xbowers,I can assure u its not the knockback that is a problem,its the Big Kaboom that comes after it.Str bower's aren't any prob for me either now imagine a Pure int archer :roll:

On Topic:Ice also has snow shield to consider.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group