|
Silkroad Online
|
Silkroad Forums
|
Affiliates
|



|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
Karras
|
Post subject: ICE vs PROT Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:58 am |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 659 Location:
|
At 100 CAP.
Taking up Prot would give more Def Increase or Taking Up Ice Mastery?
What I meant was, If I am a lvl 100 FF Bow with Garment. Would Prot give me more Phy Def Increase or taking up ICE Mastery.
_________________ << banned from srf for proof of botting. -cin >>
|
|
Top |
|
 |
SirSengir
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:05 am |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 184 Location:
|
Ice would. Passive is 178 and buff is 158. That's 336 more phys def. Prot doesn't even come close.
_________________ Lvl 94 Full Warrior Warlock Lvl 100 Str Archer Lvl 94 Int S&S
|
|
Top |
|
 |
[Orphen]
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:07 am |
|
Loyal Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 1751 Location: In your house, stealing your Dew.
|
SirSengir wrote: Ice would. Passive is 178 and buff is 158. That's 336 more phys def. Prot doesn't even come close. but wut do you know, you're always stoned sir. oh, n i want screenie of stats on sasan
|
|
Top |
|
 |
urlick
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:13 am |
|
Banned User |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 29 Location: Italy, Rome
|
If u got a 100 Full strong , up 20 lvl of ice , and use Garment ^^.
_________________ New Sig .. xD
Gius3ppe lvl 97 warrior gap 7 Sfeptor lvl 97 s / s gap 7
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Lempi
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:57 am |
|
Veteran Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 3203 Location: England
|
Should be in Questions and Answers, but we can work around that.
Imo, if you want extra phy defence you should use garment and have 80 light, 20 cold. That wil give you a small amount of phy def and 20% snow shield.
But lets face it, you will be a typical 94+ bowman and spam knockback, so who cares about a little extra phy defense, honestly?
_________________
 Saddam✓ Osama✓ Gaddafi✓ Justin Bieber☐ Rebecca Black☐
|
|
Top |
|
 |
kukreknecmi
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:01 am |
|
New Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 26 Location: Promised Lands
|
You cant stand a chance against int chars, unless your head chest legs are sun. Garment is better choice. if you think that you wont use phantom/shadow skillz on light, then cold instead of light is better choice.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
penfold1992
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:57 pm |
|
Senior Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2007 Posts: 4060 Location:
|
ice is by far but if its a choice between ice or prot it has to be prot. u can change to prot any time u want. you cant change a mastery when ever u want...
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
TillTheEnd
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:41 pm |
|
Valued Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Apr 2009 Posts: 458 Location: Valhalla
|
kukreknecmi wrote: You cant stand a chance against int chars, unless your head chest legs are sun. Garment is better choice. if you think that you wont use phantom/shadow skillz on light, then cold instead of light is better choice. ur are dead wrong my friend, I have lvl98-100 prot set, I don't even need snow shield vs nukers, regular pots+vigors work fine, even str with garment use vigors vs nukers so i don't see the problem, at least have proof before making blunt statements, they don't even come close, so im sure a lvl 96 chest/legs works just as fine, pure str+vigors+pills=kills all int. jewels is ur best defense vs nukers, test it urself, prot, will give better defense then max ice, ice gives pure phy. def, if you factor prot phy. def and phy, reinforce, prot is better.
_________________ Are you so foolish as to not realize your own impotence? -Freya. This ritual demands a sacrifice, and I can think of none more enticing than you...,Repent, for death is upon you -Arch Demon.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
TheSlink
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:07 am |
|
Valued Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 364 Location:
|
Lempi wrote: Should be in Questions and Answers, but we can work around that.
Imo, if you want extra phy defence you should use garment and have 80 light, 20 cold. That wil give you a small amount of phy def and 20% snow shield.
But lets face it, you will be a typical 94+ bowman and spam knockback, so who cares about a little extra phy defense, honestly? I lol'ed. Its so true.. i watch bowers pvp.. and as soon as a nuker/glavie/warrior actaully begins to hurt then.. its KB,KB,KB,KB,KB > ATTACK < .. Or.. its just phantom and run.. silly really.. But, OT: I think the ice is better.. depending on the +"0" of the actuall prot set, not forgetting the infamous white stats...
_________________ .:: Current Status ::. Current Level: 103 ~ 54,45%
.:: SP Remaining ::. 273,000
.:: Dual Weapon ::. 103 Pacheon ~ FF 102 102 Bicheon ~ FF 102 103 Fire ~ FF 103
# Current Speed Drug Cost, Don't Ask!!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
loveisintheair
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:50 am |
|
Valued Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 352 Location:
|
TheSlink wrote: Lempi wrote: Should be in Questions and Answers, but we can work around that.
Imo, if you want extra phy defence you should use garment and have 80 light, 20 cold. That wil give you a small amount of phy def and 20% snow shield.
But lets face it, you will be a typical 94+ bowman and spam knockback, so who cares about a little extra phy defense, honestly? I lol'ed. Its so true.. i watch bowers pvp.. and as soon as a nuker/glavie/warrior actaully begins to hurt then.. its KB,KB,KB,KB,KB > ATTACK < .. Or.. its just phantom and run.. silly really.. But, OT: I think the ice is better.. depending on the +"0" of the actuall prot set, not forgetting the infamous white stats... That's what I do. I'm a pure INT archer. I don't have a shield. Arrow combos ARE my shield. Xbowers and wizards go down like trash. As for other builds, that's the only way I stay alive. Don't like constant KB? Too bad! It's in the game... deal with it.
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
xKingpinx
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:24 am |
|
Advanced Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 2153 Location:
|
And bladers have KD...and Hueskal have extra hp passive...its the game guys deal with it...bowers dont have extra defense from shield or some kind of hp passive...its about time they got something worth while.. And that statement that guy made about the prot and dieing easily against int...that is so wrong my friend..im full prot and I pvped a lvl 100 a pure nuker with +7 s/s FF and garms +5 last tier...and I beat him. Firewall is your best friend  Of course that was back when I was 96 with 94-96 gear... now i have a full blue +5 96-99 set..
_________________
|
|
Top |
|
 |
TheSlink
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:39 am |
|
Valued Member |
 |
 |
Joined: May 2008 Posts: 364 Location:
|
loveisintheair wrote: TheSlink wrote: Lempi wrote: Should be in Questions and Answers, but we can work around that.
Imo, if you want extra phy defence you should use garment and have 80 light, 20 cold. That wil give you a small amount of phy def and 20% snow shield.
But lets face it, you will be a typical 94+ bowman and spam knockback, so who cares about a little extra phy defense, honestly? I lol'ed. Its so true.. i watch bowers pvp.. and as soon as a nuker/glavie/warrior actaully begins to hurt then.. its KB,KB,KB,KB,KB > ATTACK < .. Or.. its just phantom and run.. silly really.. But, OT: I think the ice is better.. depending on the +"0" of the actuall prot set, not forgetting the infamous white stats... That's what I do. I'm a pure INT archer. I don't have a shield. Arrow combos ARE my shield. Xbowers and wizards go down like trash. As for other builds, that's the only way I stay alive. Don't like constant KB? Too bad! It's in the game... deal with it. *Whahahah* Calm down, i was just saying how people overuse the skill.. If people had a brain and didnt spam KB and actually attack.. Because spamming knockback on a say glavier.. wont even touch his HP.. whilst your dieing.. Silly.. because the glavier will keep comming and your keeping dieing.. use 1 or 2 knockbacks... then attack again.. Remember you need to kill your target as well..
_________________ .:: Current Status ::. Current Level: 103 ~ 54,45%
.:: SP Remaining ::. 273,000
.:: Dual Weapon ::. 103 Pacheon ~ FF 102 102 Bicheon ~ FF 102 103 Fire ~ FF 103
# Current Speed Drug Cost, Don't Ask!!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
lucid4life
|
Post subject: Re: ICE vs PROT Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:17 am |
|
Common Member |
 |
 |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 140 Location:
|
loveisintheair wrote: That's what I do. I'm a pure INT archer. I don't have a shield. Arrow combos ARE my shield. Xbowers and wizards go down like trash. As for other builds, that's the only way I stay alive.
Don't like constant KB? Too bad! It's in the game... deal with it. Im one of those Xbowers,I can assure u its not the knockback that is a problem,its the Big Kaboom that comes after it.Str bower's aren't any prob for me either now imagine a Pure int archer  On Topic:Ice also has snow shield to consider.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|