Deacon Exposed

Priam · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:08 am

well, i'm glad you had the 'nutz' to say something.

And i normally encourage that, but not without proof, and to be frank, you're 'evidence' isn't all that great.

which explaines my reactions.

NuclearSilo · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:08 am

buster5995 wrote:

Leon wrote:

NuclearSilo wrote:

1. Give us a link to that private forum
2. Proove that that registered person in that forum is this Deacon
3. Give a video or SS (stucking in wall for ex) if possible. Anything related to chat box or SS or HTML are fail.
4. The only thing which is related to Deacon from the pics above is the word "Deacon". If someone edited it to "Cresta" for example, things will be completly different.

Well that reply is unlike you, normally you flame right away at the accused person, making him even look more like a botter.. :banghead:

+1000000

Are u sure? Im not a flamer who always search for war. Before, it's because ppl always have a bot finger icon, or no yellow box, or zoom too far out of range (zoomhack), etc... all the evidence are in front of your eyes but u just want to deny it, or u are too dumb to realize it.
Those pics above proove nothing except the word "Deacon" in chat box as far as I understand.

buster5995 · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 444 **Location:**

NuclearSilo wrote:

buster5995 wrote:

He has Soft mod loader icon on screen,

and since hes a mod, dont expect ANYTHING to happen.

What is a "softmod loader"? I never heard about such thing.
Or "softmod", or "loader" ...
Mind u explain more plz?

Softmod is a modded verion of isro bot that you have to pay for, it also has a loader so you can multi-client as many chars as you like.

Barotix · **Joined:** Jul 2007 **Posts:** 9250 **Location:** Sand

Do you posters not know the meaning of sufficient evidence, let me help you out here to show why this topic not only "fails", but also, why the evidence won't get the wanted result.

We know Deacon's character is named Deacon, we are unaware his girlfriend has a character. We cannot prove that is his girlfriend's character, and we will not simply take your word for it. It is easy to photo shop and only shows a discussion. We need a picture of the CHARACTER DEACON hummping a wall/tree, you going purple, and him not responding to text. The text needs to be in "All chat" and "Private Message" the text should read something like: 1]Deacon, hey Deacon. repeat a few times, then follow up with 2]Are you botting? Hey Deacon, you bot? repeat it a few times. It needs to be deacon grinding, not some chat. Now as for the quote, Do you know how easy it is to change the quote? Finally the desktop screenshot: How do any of us know that is deacon's desktop :banghead:

Now as for the people saying that Deacon won't get banned, make note: people get banned (7 days) for using 3rd party programs.

And people who falsely accuse get a punishment as well.

NuclearSilo · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:15 am

buster5995 wrote:

NuclearSilo wrote:

buster5995 wrote:

He has Soft mod loader icon on screen,

and since hes a mod, dont expect ANYTHING to happen.

What is a "softmod loader"? I never heard about such thing.
Or "softmod", or "loader" ...
Mind u explain more plz?

Softmod is a modded verion of isro bot that you have to pay for, it also has a loader so you can multi-client as many chars as you like.

How do u know about that thing but I dont know? O_o

Leon · **Joined:** Jan 2008 **Posts:** 273 **Location:** OTL

Barotix wrote:

Do you posters not know the meaning of sufficient evidence, let me help you out here to show why this topic not only "fails", but also, why the evidence won't get the wanted result.

We know Deacon's character is named Deacon, we are unaware his girlfriend has a character. We cannot prove that is his girlfriend's character, and we will not simply take your word for it. It is easy to photo shop and only shows a discussion. We need a picture of the CHARACTER DEACON hummping a wall/tree, you going purple, and him not responding to text. The text needs to be in "All chat" and "Private Message" the text should read something like: 1]Deacon, hey Deacon. repeat a few times, then follow up with 2]Are you botting? Hey Deacon, you bot? repeat it a few times. It needs to be deacon grinding, not some chat. Now as for the quote, Do you know how easy it is to change the quote? Finally the desktop screenshot: How do any of us know that is deacon's desktop :banghead:

Now as for the people saying that Deacon won't get banned, make note: people get banned (7 days) for using 3rd party programs.

And people who falsely accuse get a punishment as well.

Deacon's real name is Nick, appearantly those screenshots show 'Nicks' conversations with those ppl...

Priam · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:18 am

see, i knew they were gonna throw it at the MSN convo lol. Still insufficient.

Oh and Leon, more info? like what's his social security number. I'll photoshop some SS, and we can submit it as evidence #3

Barotix · **Joined:** Jul 2007 **Posts:** 9250 **Location:** Sand

Leon wrote:

Barotix wrote:

Do you posters not know the meaning of sufficient evidence, let me help you out here to show why this topic not only "fails", but also, why the evidence won't get the wanted result.

We know Deacon's character is named Deacon, we are unaware his girlfriend has a character. We cannot prove that is his girlfriend's character, and we will not simply take your word for it. It is easy to photo shop and only shows a discussion. We need a picture of the CHARACTER DEACON hummping a wall/tree, you going purple, and him not responding to text. The text needs to be in "All chat" and "Private Message" the text should read something like: 1]Deacon, hey Deacon. repeat a few times, then follow up with 2]Are you botting? Hey Deacon, you bot? repeat it a few times. It needs to be deacon grinding, not some chat. Now as for the quote, Do you know how easy it is to change the quote? Finally the desktop screenshot: How do any of us know that is deacon's desktop :banghead:

Now as for the people saying that Deacon won't get banned, make note: people get banned (7 days) for using 3rd party programs.

And people who falsely accuse get a punishment as well.

Deacon's real name is Nick, appearantly those screenshots show 'Nicks' conversations with those ppl...

I know deacon's real name, i have his MSN. Who is to say, holy here didn't just pick the name "Nick" and start chatting it up? On MSN you can be anyone. His girlfriend's name i believe is Stephanie.

All it takes is two disgruntled members to pretend to be Nick and Stephanie, change a few avatars: 1,2,3 you got evidence that can be de-bunked. This isn't good evidence XD

jarrod · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 708 **Location:**

are you HueHang?

why you guys, out of the blue (leon and holy)is so determined to proof that deacon bots?

buster5995 · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 444 **Location:**

NuclearSilo wrote:

buster5995 wrote:

quote="buster5995"]He has Soft mod loader icon on screen,

and since hes a mod, dont expect ANYTHING to happen.

What is a "softmod loader"? I never heard about such thing.
Or "softmod", or "loader" ...
Mind u explain more plz?

Softmod is a modded verion of isro bot that you have to pay for, it also has a loader so you can multi-client as many chars as you like.[/quote]
How do u know about that thing but I dont know? O_o[/quote]

because im smart and awear of the shit out there, go on accuse me of botting, mod just said you can get punished for accusing wrongly too.

tedtwilliger · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:22 am

And Barotix's logic is right. As nuclear said all this proves is that a character named deacon said those things. How can we prove its the real deacon? Wheres the proof of him using the bot?

Even if he does bot, this is not enough proof to prove he does.

Also this belongs in the exposed botters section doesn't it?

dragonKiller · **Joined:** Mar 2008 **Posts:** 201 **Location:**

If it's true it shouldn't be hard to get more evidence right?

buster5995 · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 444 **Location:**

tedtwilliger wrote:

And Barotix's logic is right. As nuclear said all this proves is that a character named deacon said those things. How can we prove its the real deacon? Wheres the proof of him using the bot?

Even if he does bot, this is not enough proof to prove he does.

Also this belongs in the exposed botters section doesn't it?

dylan, <3

tedtwilliger · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:24 am

the names ted...

>.<

jarrod · **Joined:** Sep 2006 **Posts:** 708 **Location:**

MOved >>>>>> Locked

buster5995 · **Joined:** Jun 2007 **Posts:** 444 **Location:**

tedtwilliger wrote:

the names ted...

>.<

stfu
i hate you

HolyPure · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 365 **Location:** Hotan

cant u read lol

http://img247.imageshack.us/my.php?imag ... cd3ub3.jpg

and about all photoshop thing, just LOL ! i dont blame some1 whos not a botter be sure

and we never will find the char Deacon bot, never, he is fullfarmd for 90cap (legit) but still bot on other chars, we´ll see if that is enought 2 hide behind

finaly realy gn, good flame then ^^

NoWhere2Run · **Joined:** Feb 2007 **Posts:** 29 **Location:**

hahahhahahahahah.lol @ holy pure

from what i remember holy pure in a botted char. and he is the lollybabe spamer / scammer of oasis. so if you ban deacon ban him as well.

Priam · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:29 am

we're not gonna take your word for it. U need to bring some real proof to the table. We've seen how easy those screens can be photoshopped from ealrier bot threads.

sorry.

XemnasXD · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:32 am

nagagagagagaga

this is really funny

HolyPure · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 365 **Location:** Hotan

NoWhere2Run wrote:

hahahhahahahahah.lol @ holy pure

from what i remember holy pure in a botted char. and he is the lollybabe spamer / scammer of oasis. so if you ban deacon ban him as well.

lol botter, i did freez u over 1h with run in the cave, shush !

Crumpets · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 7800 **Location:**

dragonKiller wrote:

If it's true it shouldn't be hard to get more evidence right?

Plus one.

Skyve · **Joined:** Apr 2006 **Posts:** 7328 **Location:** Canada

Barotix wrote:

Do you posters not know the meaning of sufficient evidence, let me help you out here to show why this topic not only "fails", but also, why the evidence won't get the wanted result.

We know Deacon's character is named Deacon, we are unaware his girlfriend has a character. We cannot prove that is his girlfriend's character, and we will not simply take your word for it. It is easy to photo shop and only shows a discussion. We need a picture of the CHARACTER DEACON hummping a wall/tree, you going purple, and him not responding to text. The text needs to be in "All chat" and "Private Message" the text should read something like: 1]Deacon, hey Deacon. repeat a few times, then follow up with 2]Are you botting? Hey Deacon, you bot? repeat it a few times. It needs to be deacon grinding, not some chat. Now as for the quote, Do you know how easy it is to change the quote? Finally the desktop screenshot: How do any of us know that is deacon's desktop :banghead:

Now as for the people saying that Deacon won't get banned, make note: people get banned (7 days) for using 3rd party programs.

And people who falsely accuse get a punishment as well.

How would it be false?If he thinks its true,you cant judge that he wanted to make him look like a bot for no reasons?

Barotix · **Joined:** Jul 2007 **Posts:** 9250 **Location:** Sand

Loki wrote:

Barotix wrote:

Do you posters not know the meaning of sufficient evidence, let me help you out here to show why this topic not only "fails", but also, why the evidence won't get the wanted result.

We know Deacon's character is named Deacon, we are unaware his girlfriend has a character. We cannot prove that is his girlfriend's character, and we will not simply take your word for it. It is easy to photo shop and only shows a discussion. We need a picture of the CHARACTER DEACON hummping a wall/tree, you going purple, and him not responding to text. The text needs to be in "All chat" and "Private Message" the text should read something like: 1]Deacon, hey Deacon. repeat a few times, then follow up with 2]Are you botting? Hey Deacon, you bot? repeat it a few times. It needs to be deacon grinding, not some chat. Now as for the quote, Do you know how easy it is to change the quote? Finally the desktop screenshot: How do any of us know that is deacon's desktop :banghead:

Now as for the people saying that Deacon won't get banned, make note: people get banned (7 days) for using 3rd party programs.

And people who falsely accuse get a punishment as well.

How would it be false?If he thinks its true,you cant judge that he wanted to make him look like a bot for no reasons?

He said he is an ex-union member of deacon's. There are numerous reasons to leave a union, there are also numerous reasons to be kicked from a guild. I typed "disgruntled member", member referring to ex-union member. -_-

NuclearSilo · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:52 am

when will u give up? =.=

XemnasXD · **Posted:** Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:56 am

btw why hasn't this been moved yet....at least one mod knows its in the wrong section.

spyboy1o1 · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 522 **Location:**

u bot to holy, u can tell because it took u over 7.5 seconds to respond to the last post...

ShiningBow · **Joined:** Sep 2007 **Posts:** 895 **Location:**

Wow everyones fighting each other lol this place is falling apart :shock:

caseyd4 · **Joined:** Apr 2007 **Posts:** 669 **Location:**

Im sorry But I know there is places for things to be said, but I must say.

What you have started in this section is as close to discrimination and down right abandoning of decent moral rights as I have known to happen on here.

THIS IS WHAT YOU HAVE GIVEN YOUR SELF UP FOR, making yourself no worse than boths. Wheres the Fires, Pitchforks and the Wells lets drown the witches.

dragonKiller · **Joined:** Mar 2008 **Posts:** 201 **Location:**

Atleast he's trying to get rid of bots, what are you doing but accusing other people without evidence. He's coming with something, at the least, but it isn't sufficient for these forums so he needs to get more evidence, that's all.

Silkroad Online Forums

Deacon Exposed

Who is online