Vinyl wrote:
A bard/cleric is too dependent on a party, but once in a party, you shine like the sun. in group pvp, your a master healer too.
a wizard/bard just has extra speed and noise and no def. buffs so basically, on a party mob or giant, your gonna die. if a champion crits you, your gonna die. but that's just solo. in a group, youll be fine and in jobbing the speed is beneficial. but there aren't 24/7 groups. so decide what you wanna do.
I disagree here. First off all a bard/cleric doesnt shine in a party. It makes other builds shine. In particular wizards. Full buffed wizzys with LT are beasts.
When you have wiz / bard ( which I would choose) you can have 2 different roles in partys. A dmging role and a supporting role. Battle barding is fun and so is wizzing in group pvp. Cleric/bard is just really passive in my opinion. Also dont think about soloing to much, you are a europe go grouping ;D. Seriously all pure int europes sxck in group pvp when they are not in a party. As for solo lvling wiz/bard does a really good job. Just take a wolf with you for the giants.
but now I read other topics and they say you will get killed easy with bard and u can beter take cleric as sub?? 
if thats true than I gonna make a battle bard/cleric. because most of the times when I join a LTP there is always 1 wizard in it probably boting in cave and they die a lot with cleric as sub!
