Silkroad Online Forums

A community forum for the free online game Silkroad Online. Discuss Silkroad Online, read up on guides, and build your character and skills.

Faq Search Members Chat  Register Profile Login

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: WARLOCK/CLERIC OR S/S BOTH PURE INT
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:39 am 
Common Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 195
Location: Holland
I dont know which one to take, because the warlock/cleric is a nice char but you need alot of quick handling, but a pure int s/s is with 90 cap good I think, because they can knockdown and stab till they are that, and with the nukes they can hit very high on euros. The probem is that the s/s is not good at pvp against chinese, only against euros. And what about not 1v1 but group fight, CF and all that kind of stuff. And what about the looks, wich looks better from them because I like nice gear:)

Please help me with making my discission.
Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WARLOCK/CLERIC OR S/S BOTH PURE INT
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:48 am 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 307
Location:
Babel
jarjar75 wrote:
I dont know which one to take, because the warlock/cleric is a nice char but you need alot of quick handling, but a pure int s/s is with 90 cap good I think, because they can knockdown and stab till they are that, and with the nukes they can hit very high on euros. The probem is that the s/s is not good at pvp against chinese, only against euros. And what about not 1v1 but group fight, CF and all that kind of stuff. And what about the looks, wich looks better from them because I like nice gear:)

Please help me with making my discission.
Thanks

the first question to ask urself is how much do u want to farm
seccondly they are both strong and int chineese are good against othere chineese builds
and about gear i dont know about your server but on babel their is like 6-7 high lvl warlocks and 2 of them have sun so the demand for warlock rods is low and its easy to obtain a really good rod for cheap but im sure their are lots of nukers on ur server making the price higher and for looks i think 9d euro robe is pretty damn hot. as for survivability goes if ur going pure int a warlock will die in 2-3 hits if they dont act quick because of pot delay int s/s on the other hand has fast pots and snowshield to help them tank more

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WARLOCK/CLERIC OR S/S BOTH PURE INT
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 12:52 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 565
Location: on Earth
whorelock wrote:
jarjar75 wrote:
I dont know which one to take, because the warlock/cleric is a nice char but you need alot of quick handling, but a pure int s/s is with 90 cap good I think, because they can knockdown and stab till they are that, and with the nukes they can hit very high on euros. The probem is that the s/s is not good at pvp against chinese, only against euros. And what about not 1v1 but group fight, CF and all that kind of stuff. And what about the looks, wich looks better from them because I like nice gear:)

Please help me with making my discission.
Thanks

the first question to ask urself is how much do u want to farm
seccondly they are both strong and int chineese are good against othere chineese builds
and about gear i dont know about your server but on babel their is like 6-7 high lvl warlocks and 2 of them have sun so the demand for warlock rods is low and its easy to obtain a really good rod for cheap but im sure their are lots of nukers on ur server making the price higher and for looks i think 9d euro robe is pretty damn hot. as for survivability goes if ur going pure int a warlock will die in 2-3 hits if they dont act quick because of pot delay int s/s on the other hand has fast pots and snowshield to help them tank more


protector is better :roll:
and who said s/s is only good against euro :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WARLOCK/CLERIC OR S/S BOTH PURE INT
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 2:04 pm 
Banned User
Offline

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 318
Location:
Uranus
sorry to say that but is it possible for s/s to kill a blessed wizard? warlock is better imo (it is more fun :D)

_________________
<<banned from SRF for remaking a banned account. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WARLOCK/CLERIC OR S/S BOTH PURE INT
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:40 pm 
Common Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 109
Location: Hell
Lol I kill s/s bladers and nukers easilly on my rogue :D

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WARLOCK/CLERIC OR S/S BOTH PURE INT
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:38 pm 
Loyal Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1837
Location: Georgian4ever
Ring wrote:
Lol I kill s/s bladers and nukers easilly on my rogue :D


and rogues are easly to kill too .

_________________
Image
thanks to Mirosuke


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WARLOCK/CLERIC OR S/S BOTH PURE INT
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:28 pm 
Banned User
User avatar
Offline

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 134
Location: New Jack City
rogues are save nubs...saddest build on SRO

_________________
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WARLOCK/CLERIC OR S/S BOTH PURE INT
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:40 pm 
Active Member
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 565
Location: on Earth
wetgwap wrote:
rogues are save nubs...saddest build on SRO


:roll:
if u play it right you can beat a warrior/cleric
as long as they don't spam iron skin/bless/kb


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group