Intersting

Karras · **Joined:** Nov 2008 **Posts:** 659 **Location:**

Now that Silkroad Guard is updating.
Let see how this work out.
My prediction.

1) IF Silkroad Guard works and botters get banned.
It will be disabled by JM within 2 mths.

2) Silkroad Guard got bypassed by most 3rd parth software. Render useless.

Discuss.

Sir_Edward · **Joined:** Mar 2009 **Posts:** 867 **Location:**

there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

XesoS · **Posted:** Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:57 pm

Sir_Edward wrote:

there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

+1 like always ... they give us some hope but in the end , Joymax only thinks about $$$$$$$$

SnowShael · **Joined:** Aug 2009 **Posts:** 203 **Location:**

I think it's cute people think a Game Guard/ Hack Shield will stop Clientless bot's from logging in.

Crowley · **Posted:** Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:13 pm

Intersting

curvekiller · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 975 **Location:** Bavaria

Tsume wrote:

Intersting

+1
Unfortunately it will be option 2, as always...
Joymax just loves money... :banghead:

PR0METHEUS · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 4093 **Location:** Earth

Sir_Edward wrote:

there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.

I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.

Hennessey · **Joined:** Feb 2008 **Posts:** 459 **Location:**

intersting indeed

_Razor_ · **Joined:** Oct 2009 **Posts:** 19 **Location:**

Prediction ?

We already know what will happen.

Goldbots will bring a sexy back.

Anyone who think else is an idiot

curvekiller · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 975 **Location:** Bavaria

PR0METHEUS wrote:

Sir_Edward wrote:

there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.

I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.

It's actually bad because all the other goldbots will copy the few working bots... :banghead:

MrSonic · **Joined:** Jan 2008 **Posts:** 325 **Location:**

As long as it keeps the MAJORITY of the bots out for at least a few days it'll already be a big improvement compared to what JM has been doing for the past year.

Although i have to say that moving to HackShield was a horrible idea, considering their security system is one of the most bypassed in FPS games.

PR0METHEUS · **Joined:** Aug 2006 **Posts:** 4093 **Location:** Earth

curvekiller wrote:

PR0METHEUS wrote:

Sir_Edward wrote:

there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.

I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.

It's actually bad because all the other goldbots will copy the few working bots... :banghead:

What's wrong with that? That just gives Joymax less types of bots to detect and ban. Ban most of them, everyone copies the working ones, then ban 30,000 copies of the same 2 or 3 bots.

Wash, rinse, repeat until all bot types are detected and eliminated.

Sure, new bot types will be created, but they will be easier to identify than the initial 15 types or whatever it is.

Heosphoros · **Joined:** Apr 2009 **Posts:** 682 **Location:**

Isn't there support to be a e in between the r & s.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.

Hex Link · **Posted:** Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:28 am

PR0METHEUS wrote:

Sir_Edward wrote:

there are already a few goldbots in the servers along with peoples personal bots. option 2 seems to be the winner

If there are only 'a few' gold bots in the servers, it would seem the silkroad guard is working... at least somewhat.

I would have expected to see 'a LOT' of gold bots in each server.

Maybe its because botters are scared to login....
You wouldnt want to lose your account, even if you use bots!

And yes it is intersting

Karras · **Joined:** Nov 2008 **Posts:** 659 **Location:**

So far most bots are working, only thing thats not working is clientless.
It won't be long till they bypass that security check.

curvekiller · **Joined:** Jan 2009 **Posts:** 975 **Location:** Bavaria

Let's hope for good updates next inspection... :!:

sn1kzZe · **Joined:** Jan 2007 **Posts:** 246 **Location:** 127.0.0.1

Heosphoros wrote:

Isn't there support to be a e in between the r & s.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.

than take a 2nd look at your own post wiseguy

Kraq · **Posted:** Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:12 pm

Intersting, very intersting.

This is support to be free to play game!

Heosphoros · **Joined:** Apr 2009 **Posts:** 682 **Location:**

sn1kzZe wrote:

Heosphoros wrote:

Isn't there support to be a e in between the r & s.
Interesting(?) Sorry things like this irk me.

than take a 2nd look at your own post wiseguy

It was a serious question since everyone was saying intersting. I wasn't trying to be a wiseguy. I'm sorry i ment to type "suppose" but you still got the idea, its an isolated incident, wheras "intersting" was seen multiple times, which peaked me to ask if that is how its really spelt, since, afaik, the search button on the all mighty google is to hard for me to find.

Crowley · **Posted:** Fri Jan 22, 2010 6:20 am

Honey, we just wrote it that way because of the topic title :love:

vermillion · **Posted:** Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:11 am

intersting if this goes on I might play again.. oh nvm. come on we all know JM too well. :roll:

Silkroad Online Forums

Intersting

Who is online